Score de sécurité
65 / 100
Le score combine contrôles techniques, réputation, historique du site, renseignement arnaque et analyse IA.
Signaux derrière votre score
Limited verification
Disponibilité : limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection : blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=25701
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Aucun signalement connu de phishing, malware ou alerte police dans cette analyse.
Schémas de risque détectés
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Aucune ligne de risque prioritaire supplémentaire au-delà des correspondances de listes.
Signaux utiles et observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages)Fiabilité de la source: low
Check unavailable
RDAP lookup overrun or error: RDAP provider timed out after 2500ms
Source : RDAPFiabilité de la source: low
Aucun signalement de phishing connu
Ce site n’était pas sur les listes de phishing connues dans ce scan. Les sites frauduleux apparaissent vite—ce n’est qu’un signal.
Source : OpenPhishFiabilité de la source: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source : URLhausFiabilité de la source: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: COMODO CA Limited. Expiry: 2026-11-11T23:59:59.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate checkFiabilité de la source: high
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source : Fraudly redirect analysisFiabilité de la source: high
Domaine et enregistrement
- URL/nom d’hôte vérifié : caixabank.es
- Domaine enregistré : caixabank.es
- Date d’enregistrement : inconnu
- Âge du domaine : Unavailable
- Registrar : inconnu
- Pays : inconnu
- Date d’expiration : inconnu
- Confidentialité / indications de propriété masquées : non / inconnu
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)
Analyse des redirections
- URL d’origine : https://caixabank.es/
- URL finale : https://www.caixabank.es/index_es.html
- Domaine final : caixabank.es
- Nombre de redirections : 2
- Autre domaine enregistrable : non
- https://www.caixabank.es/
- https://www.caixabank.es/index_es.html
Contrôles de sécurité (HTTPS / certificats)
- HTTPS/TLS accessible : oui
- Certificat fiable lors de la sonde : oui
- Possiblement auto-signé / non fiable : non / inconnu
- Émetteur : COMODO CA Limited
- Expiration : 2026-11-11T23:59:59.000Z
Source : TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentaucune correspondance
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages) · gravité : info · fiabilité: low
Check unavailabledomainaucune correspondance
RDAP lookup overrun or error: RDAP provider timed out after 2500ms
Source : RDAP · gravité : info · fiabilité: low
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingaucune correspondance
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source : OpenPhish · gravité : info · fiabilité: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareaucune correspondance
HTTP 401
Source : URLhaus · gravité : info · fiabilité: low
HTTPS is availablesslaucune correspondance
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: COMODO CA Limited. Expiry: 2026-11-11T23:59:59.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate check · gravité : info · fiabilité: high
Redirect chain detecteddomaincorrespondance
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source : Fraudly redirect analysis · gravité : info · fiabilité: high
Enrichissement de réputation
Passage réputation élargie optionnelle si disponible—au-delà des sondes de base rapides.
Aucun profil de réputation enrichi. Cela limite le contexte ; cela ne prouve pas que le site est dangereux.
Sondes d’avis rapides (scan de base)
Contrôles d’annuaires légers pour le modèle—les ratés décrivent notre instantané, pas l’honnêteté du site.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Verified
VerifiedGoogle Reviews
★½☆☆☆1.5 / 5
Based on 24 reviews
La Caixa is the worst. Their app is the worst I've ever used from a bank. It doesn't track income and expenses correctly; they try to solve everything through the app, and it's a robot—zero in-person help. They force …
Poor public reputation
Mixed reviews — check delivery, returns and policy before ordering
La Caixa is the worst. Their app is the worst I've ever used from a bank. It doesn't track income and expenses correctly; they try to solve everything through the app, and it's a robot—zero in-person help. They force …
- No reliable public review data found
The website has a low Google rating with negative reviews, and no Trustpilot profile was found, indicating potential trust issues.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Disponibilité des sources (neutre)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Instantanés bruts des avis
Instantané brut Trustpilot : non disponible dans cette charge.
Instantané brut Google Reviews : non disponible dans cette charge.
Signaux d’exécution
Dropshipping : peu probable · Expédition liée à la Chine : peu probable · Stock/production locale : peu probable · Confiance : low · Ajustement du score : 0
- Marketplace terms detected: peu probable
- Third-party seller language detected: peu probable
- Cross-border shipping detected: peu probable
- Supplier fulfillment detected: peu probable
- Separate shipment language detected: peu probable
- International shipping detected: peu probable
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 2 segments / 1818 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Détail du score (avancé)
Le modèle combine impacts bruts × confiance côté serveur. Les valeurs positives augmentent le score de risque ; les négatives le baissent. Les lignes neutres sont explicatives — pas une recommandation.
Plafond de note de sécurité après garde-fous d'identité : 82/100 de confiance affiché.
« Fiable » a été retenu car la réputation ou le RDAP n’ont pas ancré l’identité de façon indépendante dans cet instantané.
Signaux de score combinés (avis, réputation, flux, exécution…)
Signaux positifs pour la confiance
- Business name presence (-3 brut · medium confiance) — References Caixabank.
- Physical address signal (-4 brut · medium confiance) — Physical address signal
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 brut · low confiance) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 brut · medium confiance) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Observations site et techniques
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 brut · medium confiance) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 brut · low confiance) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Schémas de risque détectés
- Poor Google reviews (+11 brut · low confiance) — Google rating 1.5 with 24 reviews raises risk in proportion to poor ratings and review volume.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 brut · low confiance) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
Données incomplètes ou indisponibles
- Domain registration age unavailable (+0 brut · low confiance) — Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal.
- Domain ownership could not be verified from public registration data (+1 brut · low confiance) — WHOIS/RDAP did not expose corroboratable registrant signals in this crawl. That is common and mainly reduces how confidently we can score—not evidence of impersonation by itself.
Pondération renseignement arnaque (modèle)
Aucune contribution intel pondérée dans cette exécution.
Notes collecteur d’avis (neutre)
Les buckets distinguent erreurs fournisseur, pannes de sources, signaux d’avis et (rare) transparence crawler—jamais fusionnés avec l’intel arnaque.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Facteurs clés expliqués
Notes combinées de motifs détectés, score arnaque et aide IA optionnelle—pas un conseil juridique ou financier.
- AI risk signal: medium
- The website has a low Google rating of 1.5 based on 24 reviews, indicating negative consumer sentiment.
- No reliable public review data was found from Trustpilot, which raises concerns about the overall reputation.
Modèle IA utilisé : oui
