Score de sécurité
95 / 100
Le score combine contrôles techniques, réputation, historique du site, renseignement arnaque et analyse IA.
Signaux derrière votre score
Limited verification
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan.
Inspection: failed · dns=true · tls=false · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=0 · extractionReason=Website responded to DNS/TLS checks, but Fraudly could not complete a public page fetch during this scan.
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Aucun signalement connu de phishing, malware ou alerte police dans cette analyse.
Schémas de risque détectés
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Aucune ligne de risque prioritaire supplémentaire au-delà des correspondances de listes.
Signaux utiles et observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages)Fiabilité de la source: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 10495 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): ssa.gov. Registrar: get.gov. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-07-14T12:25:51.210Z. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)Fiabilité de la source: high
Aucun signalement de phishing connu
Ce site n’était pas sur les listes de phishing connues dans ce scan. Les sites frauduleux apparaissent vite—ce n’est qu’un signal.
Source : OpenPhishFiabilité de la source: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source : URLhausFiabilité de la source: low
Older domain registration
The domain has been registered for roughly 28 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)Fiabilité de la source: medium
Domaine et enregistrement
- URL/nom d’hôte vérifié : ssa.gov
- Domaine enregistré : ssa.gov
- Date d’enregistrement : 1997-10-02T01:29:30.000Z
- Âge du domaine : 28 ans, 9 mois, 5 jours
- Registrar : get.gov
- Pays : inconnu
- Date d’expiration : 2027-07-14T12:25:51.210Z
- Confidentialité / indications de propriété masquées : oui
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://ssa.gov/
- Final URL: https://ssa.gov/
- Final domain: ssa.gov
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: non
- Redirect resolver note: redirect_fetch_failed
Contrôles de sécurité (HTTPS / certificats)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: oui
- Certificate trusted in probe: non
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: non / inconnu
- Issuer: DigiCert Inc
- Expiry: 2027-01-03T23:59:59.000Z
Source : TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
Privacy-protected or redacted ownershipdomainmatched
RDAP entity fields suggest privacy or redaction. This is common and not proof of abuse.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · fiabilité: low
TLS certificate validation issuesslmatched
HTTPS is reachable but the certificate did not validate as trusted or may be expired. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2027-01-03T23:59:59.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate check · severity: warning · fiabilité: medium
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · fiabilité: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 10495 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): ssa.gov. Registrar: get.gov. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-07-14T12:25:51.210Z. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · fiabilité: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source : OpenPhish · severity: info · fiabilité: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source : URLhaus · severity: info · fiabilité: low
Older domain registrationdomainno match
The domain has been registered for roughly 28 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: positive · fiabilité: medium
Enrichissement de réputation
Passage réputation élargie optionnelle si disponible—au-delà des sondes de base rapides.
Aucun profil de réputation enrichi. Cela limite le contexte ; cela ne prouve pas que le site est dangereux.
Sondes d’avis rapides (scan de base)
Contrôles d’annuaires légers pour le modèle—les ratés décrivent notre instantané, pas l’honnêteté du site.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Verified
VerifiedGoogle Reviews
★★☆☆☆2.4 / 5
Based on 460 reviews
Extremely Satisfied! I had an appointment at 2:00pm. Got there at 2:01 checked in, and immediately went inside to the interviewer. She was very helpful, polite, I was walking out at 2:09.
The problem is getting an a…
Poor public reputation
Mixed reviews — check delivery, returns and policy before ordering
Extremely Satisfied! I had an appointment at 2:00pm. Got there at 2:01 checked in, and immediately went inside to the interviewer. She was very helpful, polite, I was walking out at 2:09.
The problem is getting an a…
- No reliable public review data found
Public review data was included in this analysis.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Signaux d’exécution
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
Détail du score (avancé)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Signaux de score combinés (avis, réputation, flux, exécution…)
Signaux positifs pour la confiance
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Ssa.
- Long-established domain registration (-16 raw · high confidence) — Domain has been registered for roughly 29 years—a strong legitimacy signal.
- Established institutional-style domain (-10 raw · medium confidence) — The domain appears long-lived with stable naming patterns often seen on established service or institutional sites.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Observations site et techniques
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Schémas de risque détectés
- Poor Google reviews (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Google rating 2.4 with 460 reviews raises risk in proportion to poor ratings and review volume.
- TLS certificate validation issue (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Certificate failed validation against trust anchors.
Données incomplètes ou indisponibles
- Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields.
Pondération renseignement arnaque (modèle)
Schémas de risque détectés
- TLS certificate validation issue (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Certificate failed validation against trust anchors. · TLS certificate check
Données incomplètes ou indisponibles
- Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields. · RDAP (rdap.org)
Notes collecteur d’avis (neutre)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Facteurs clés expliqués
Notes combinées de motifs détectés, score arnaque et aide IA optionnelle—pas un conseil juridique ou financier.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- Domain length looks normal.
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
AI model used in this run: non
