Score de sécurité
79 / 100
Le score combine contrôles techniques, réputation, historique du site, renseignement arnaque et analyse IA.
Signaux derrière votre score
Limited verification
Disponibilité : limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection : blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=168739
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Aucun signalement connu de phishing, malware ou alerte police dans cette analyse.
Schémas de risque détectés
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Aucune ligne de risque prioritaire supplémentaire au-delà des correspondances de listes.
Signaux utiles et observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages)Fiabilité de la source: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 301 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): lzut.org. Registrar: Name SRS AB. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-09-09T08:04:11.580Z. Name servers: ns1.serveriai.lt, ns2.serveriai.lt, ns3.serveriai.lt, ns4.serveriai.lt. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)Fiabilité de la source: high
Aucun signalement de phishing connu
Ce site n’était pas sur les listes de phishing connues dans ce scan. Les sites frauduleux apparaissent vite—ce n’est qu’un signal.
Source : OpenPhishFiabilité de la source: medium
URLhaus unavailable
fetch failed
Source : URLhausFiabilité de la source: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-19T18:49:55.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate checkFiabilité de la source: high
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source : Fraudly redirect analysisFiabilité de la source: high
Domaine et enregistrement
- URL/nom d’hôte vérifié : lzut.org
- Domaine enregistré : lzut.org
- Date d’enregistrement : 2025-09-09T08:04:11.580Z
- Âge du domaine : 10 mois, 1 jour
- Registrar : Name SRS AB
- Pays : inconnu
- Date d’expiration : 2027-09-09T08:04:11.580Z
- Confidentialité / indications de propriété masquées : non / inconnu
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)
Analyse des redirections
- URL d’origine : https://lzut.org/
- URL finale : https://www.lzut.org/
- Domaine final : lzut.org
- Nombre de redirections : 1
- Autre domaine enregistrable : non
- https://www.lzut.org/
Contrôles de sécurité (HTTPS / certificats)
- HTTPS/TLS accessible : oui
- Certificat fiable lors de la sonde : oui
- Possiblement auto-signé / non fiable : non / inconnu
- Émetteur : Let's Encrypt
- Expiration : 2026-08-19T18:49:55.000Z
Source : TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentaucune correspondance
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages) · gravité : info · fiabilité: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainaucune correspondance
Approximate domain age: 301 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): lzut.org. Registrar: Name SRS AB. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-09-09T08:04:11.580Z. Name servers: ns1.serveriai.lt, ns2.serveriai.lt, ns3.serveriai.lt, ns4.serveriai.lt. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · gravité : info · fiabilité: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingaucune correspondance
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source : OpenPhish · gravité : info · fiabilité: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareaucune correspondance
fetch failed
Source : URLhaus · gravité : info · fiabilité: low
HTTPS is availablesslaucune correspondance
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-19T18:49:55.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate check · gravité : info · fiabilité: high
Redirect chain detecteddomaincorrespondance
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source : Fraudly redirect analysis · gravité : info · fiabilité: high
Enrichissement de réputation
Passage réputation élargie optionnelle si disponible—au-delà des sondes de base rapides.
Aucun profil de réputation enrichi. Cela limite le contexte ; cela ne prouve pas que le site est dangereux.
Sondes d’avis rapides (scan de base)
Contrôles d’annuaires légers pour le modèle—les ratés décrivent notre instantané, pas l’honnêteté du site.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No reliable public review data was found, which may indicate a lack of established reputation.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Disponibilité des sources (neutre)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Instantanés bruts des avis
Instantané brut Trustpilot : non disponible dans cette charge.
Instantané brut Google Reviews : non disponible dans cette charge.
Signaux d’exécution
Dropshipping : peu probable · Expédition liée à la Chine : peu probable · Stock/production locale : peu probable · Confiance : low · Ajustement du score : 0
- Marketplace terms detected: peu probable
- Third-party seller language detected: peu probable
- Cross-border shipping detected: peu probable
- Supplier fulfillment detected: peu probable
- Separate shipment language detected: peu probable
- International shipping detected: peu probable
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 4 segments / 13590 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Détail du score (avancé)
Le modèle combine impacts bruts × confiance côté serveur. Les valeurs positives augmentent le score de risque ; les négatives le baissent. Les lignes neutres sont explicatives — pas une recommandation.
Plafond de note de sécurité après garde-fous d'identité : 100/100 de confiance affiché.
« Fiable » a été retenu car la réputation ou le RDAP n’ont pas ancré l’identité de façon indépendante dans cet instantané.
Signaux de score combinés (avis, réputation, flux, exécution…)
Signaux positifs pour la confiance
- Contact information available (-3 brut · medium confiance) — A contact or reach-us section appears on the site.
- Business name presence (-3 brut · medium confiance) — References Lzut.
- Physical address signal (-4 brut · medium confiance) — Physical address signal
- Established payment provider (WooCommerce) (-3 brut · medium confiance) — Established payment provider (WooCommerce)
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 brut · low confiance) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- Mail exchangers with SPF or DMARC (-3 brut · low confiance) — MX exists and at least SPF or DMARC is published—common for serious domains and slightly reassuring when intel is incomplete.
Observations site et techniques
- No matched Google listing (+0 brut · high confiance) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
- Domain under one year old (+2 brut · low confiance) — Registration is less than a year old—a small uncertainty nudge, not a scam indicator on its own.
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 brut · medium confiance) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 brut · low confiance) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Schémas de risque détectés
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 brut · low confiance) — Commercial shop detected with very few policy or legal pages visible.
- Independent customer reviews not verified (+0 brut · medium confiance) — No reliable public review match was found for this young webshop — missing feedback lowers confidence, it is not proof of safety.
- Review source unavailable in this scan (+0 brut · medium confiance) — Review APIs timed out or failed — verification confidence is reduced without treating missing data as positive reputation.
- Free email contact on webshop (+5 brut · medium confiance) — Contact uses a consumer email provider (lzumtaryba@gmail.com) — common for unverified storefronts.
Pondération renseignement arnaque (modèle)
Aucune contribution intel pondérée dans cette exécution.
Notes collecteur d’avis (neutre)
Les buckets distinguent erreurs fournisseur, pannes de sources, signaux d’avis et (rare) transparence crawler—jamais fusionnés avec l’intel arnaque.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Facteurs clés expliqués
Notes combinées de motifs détectés, score arnaque et aide IA optionnelle—pas un conseil juridique ou financier.
- AI risk signal: medium
- The domain is less than a year old, which introduces some uncertainty about its legitimacy.
- No independent customer reviews were found, indicating a lack of public feedback which lowers confidence.
Modèle IA utilisé : oui
