Score de sécurité
95 / 100
Le score combine contrôles techniques, réputation, historique du site, renseignement arnaque et analyse IA.
Signaux derrière votre score
Highly Trusted
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=654765
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Aucun signalement connu de phishing, malware ou alerte police dans cette analyse.
Schémas de risque détectés
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Aucune ligne de risque prioritaire supplémentaire au-delà des correspondances de listes.
Signaux utiles et observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages)Fiabilité de la source: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 11313 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): hema.nl. Registrar: Hema B.V.. Country: not provided. Expiration: not parsed. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)Fiabilité de la source: high
Aucun signalement de phishing connu
Ce site n’était pas sur les listes de phishing connues dans ce scan. Les sites frauduleux apparaissent vite—ce n’est qu’un signal.
Source : OpenPhishFiabilité de la source: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source : URLhausFiabilité de la source: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-24T17:19:25.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate checkFiabilité de la source: high
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source : Fraudly redirect analysisFiabilité de la source: high
Older domain registration
The domain has been registered for roughly 30 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)Fiabilité de la source: medium
Domaine et enregistrement
- URL/nom d’hôte vérifié : hema.nl
- Domaine enregistré : hema.nl
- Date d’enregistrement : 1995-06-19T21:00:00.000Z
- Âge du domaine : 30 ans, 12 mois, 3 jours
- Registrar : Hema B.V.
- Pays : inconnu
- Date d’expiration : inconnu
- Confidentialité / indications de propriété masquées : oui
Source : RDAP (SIDN)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://hema.nl/
- Final URL: https://www.hema.nl/
- Final domain: hema.nl
- Redirect count: 1
- Crossed registrable domain: non
- https://www.hema.nl/
Contrôles de sécurité (HTTPS / certificats)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: oui
- Certificate trusted in probe: oui
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: non / inconnu
- Issuer: Let's Encrypt
- Expiry: 2026-08-24T17:19:25.000Z
Source : TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
Privacy-protected or redacted ownershipdomainmatched
RDAP entity fields suggest privacy or redaction. This is common and not proof of abuse.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · fiabilité: low
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · fiabilité: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 11313 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): hema.nl. Registrar: Hema B.V.. Country: not provided. Expiration: not parsed. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · fiabilité: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source : OpenPhish · severity: info · fiabilité: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source : URLhaus · severity: info · fiabilité: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-24T17:19:25.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate check · severity: info · fiabilité: high
Older domain registrationdomainno match
The domain has been registered for roughly 30 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: positive · fiabilité: medium
Redirect chain detecteddomainmatched
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source : Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: info · fiabilité: high
Enrichissement de réputation
Passage réputation élargie optionnelle si disponible—au-delà des sondes de base rapides.
Aucun profil de réputation enrichi. Cela limite le contexte ; cela ne prouve pas que le site est dangereux.
Sondes d’avis rapides (scan de base)
Contrôles d’annuaires légers pour le modèle—les ratés décrivent notre instantané, pas l’honnêteté du site.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Verified
VerifiedGoogle Reviews
★★★☆☆3.4 / 5
Based on 174 reviews
Today I paid 6 euro more than I should because the cashier didn’t scan the products correctly. I returned after 5 minutes to the store and asked a cashier (old woman with white hair) to check the invoice again and she…
Mixed public reputation
Customer experience — not a fraud signal
Today I paid 6 euro more than I should because the cashier didn’t scan the products correctly. I returned after 5 minutes to the store and asked a cashier (old woman with white hair) to check the invoice again and she…
- No reliable public review data found
Customer reviews indicate a mix of positive and negative experiences, with some complaints about service and product issues.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Signaux d’exécution
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: likely · Confidence: medium · Score nudge: -8
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 3 segments / 6620 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- Signals of local production, EU origin, or local fulfillment were found.
Détail du score (avancé)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Signaux de score combinés (avis, réputation, flux, exécution…)
Signaux positifs pour la confiance
- Local / EU production or stock signals (-8 raw · medium confidence) — Copy suggests local production, EU origin, or fast domestic fulfillment.
- Contact information available (-3 raw · medium confidence) — A contact or reach-us section appears on the site.
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Hema.
- Long-established domain registration (-16 raw · high confidence) — Domain has been registered for roughly 31 years—a strong legitimacy signal.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Observations site et techniques
- Mixed Google review signal (+3 raw · low confidence) — Mixed customer experiences reported. Check reviews, delivery times and return policy before ordering. (Google 3.4 / 174 reviews).
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Schémas de risque détectés
- No clear business address on shop pages (+14 raw · medium confidence) — Enough shop text was captured but no obvious business or return address was found—this matters more when you may pay or share delivery details.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — Commercial shop detected with very few policy or legal pages visible.
- Recognized official brand domain (-6 raw · high confidence) — This domain matches a known official domain for Hema.
Données incomplètes ou indisponibles
- Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields.
Pondération renseignement arnaque (modèle)
Données incomplètes ou indisponibles
- Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields. · RDAP (SIDN)
Notes collecteur d’avis (neutre)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Facteurs clés expliqués
Notes combinées de motifs détectés, score arnaque et aide IA optionnelle—pas un conseil juridique ou financier.
- AI risk signal: medium
- Mixed evidence from customer reviews with a Google rating of 3.4 from 174 reviews, indicating some negative experiences.
- Privacy-protected ownership details suggest a lack of transparency, which can be a risk indicator.
AI model used in this run: oui
