Score de sécurité
79 / 100
Le score combine contrôles techniques, réputation, historique du site, renseignement arnaque et analyse IA.
Signaux derrière votre score
Trust Signals Are Limited
Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=1959858
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Aucun signalement connu de phishing, malware ou alerte police dans cette analyse.
Schémas de risque détectés
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Aucune ligne de risque prioritaire supplémentaire au-delà des correspondances de listes.
Signaux utiles et observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages)Fiabilité de la source: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 37 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): 92pak11.online. Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-03T17:17:43.574Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)Fiabilité de la source: high
Aucun signalement de phishing connu
Ce site n’était pas sur les listes de phishing connues dans ce scan. Les sites frauduleux apparaissent vite—ce n’est qu’un signal.
Source : OpenPhishFiabilité de la source: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source : URLhausFiabilité de la source: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-01T17:01:11.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate checkFiabilité de la source: high
Domaine et enregistrement
- URL/nom d’hôte vérifié : 92pak11.online
- Domaine enregistré : 92pak11.online
- Date d’enregistrement : 2026-05-03T17:17:43.574Z
- Âge du domaine : 1 mois, 7 jours
- Registrar : GoDaddy.com, LLC
- Pays : inconnu
- Date d’expiration : 2027-05-03T17:17:43.574Z
- Confidentialité / indications de propriété masquées : non / inconnu
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://92pak11.online/
- Final URL: https://92pak11.online/
- Final domain: 92pak11.online
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: non
Contrôles de sécurité (HTTPS / certificats)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: oui
- Certificate trusted in probe: oui
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: non / inconnu
- Issuer: Let's Encrypt
- Expiry: 2026-08-01T17:01:11.000Z
Source : TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
Short initial registration windowdomainmatched
The gap between registration and expiration in RDAP looks shorter than many long-lived business domains.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · fiabilité: medium
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · fiabilité: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 37 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): 92pak11.online. Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-03T17:17:43.574Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source : RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · fiabilité: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source : OpenPhish · severity: info · fiabilité: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source : URLhaus · severity: info · fiabilité: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-01T17:01:11.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate check · severity: info · fiabilité: high
Enrichissement de réputation
Passage réputation élargie optionnelle si disponible—au-delà des sondes de base rapides.
Aucun profil de réputation enrichi. Cela limite le contexte ; cela ne prouve pas que le site est dangereux.
Sondes d’avis rapides (scan de base)
Contrôles d’annuaires légers pour le modèle—les ratés décrivent notre instantané, pas l’honnêteté du site.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No independent customer reviews were found, and the site lacks a strong public reputation.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Signaux d’exécution
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 1 segments / 7 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Détail du score (avancé)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
"Trusted" was withheld because reputation or RDAP lifecycle evidence did not independently anchor identity for this snapshot.
Signaux de score combinés (avis, réputation, flux, exécution…)
Signaux positifs pour la confiance
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References 92pak11.
- Physical address signal (-4 raw · medium confidence) — Physical address signal
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Observations site et techniques
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
- Relatively new website (+2 raw · low confidence) — This website is relatively new, so there is limited public history.
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Schémas de risque détectés
- Startup-style TLD pattern (+4 raw · low confidence) — The apex uses a trendy TLD (.online) seen in many harmless projects; Fraudly applies only a small nudge unless other spoofing cues appear.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
- Young domain registration (+5 raw · medium confidence) — RDAP-derived domain age ≈ 37 days.
- Short RDAP registration window (+10 raw · medium confidence) — Registration horizon between creation and expiry looks shorter than many established domains.
Pondération renseignement arnaque (modèle)
Schémas de risque détectés
- Young domain registration (+5 raw · medium confidence) — RDAP-derived domain age ≈ 37 days. · RDAP (rdap.org)
- Short RDAP registration window (+10 raw · medium confidence) — Registration horizon between creation and expiry looks shorter than many established domains. · RDAP (rdap.org)
Notes collecteur d’avis (neutre)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Facteurs clés expliqués
Notes combinées de motifs détectés, score arnaque et aide IA optionnelle—pas un conseil juridique ou financier.
- AI risk signal: medium
- The domain is relatively new, approximately 37 days old, which limits its public history and trust signals.
- There is a short registration window between creation and expiration, which is often a risk indicator for online domains.
AI model used in this run: oui
