Score de sécurité
20 / 100
Le score combine contrôles techniques, réputation, historique du site, renseignement arnaque et analyse IA.
Le renseignement arnaque faisant autorité prime sur le score principal pour garder des conseils prudents si les flux divergent.
Signaux derrière votre score
Risque phishing confirmé
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan.
Inspection: failed · dns=true · tls=false · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=0 · extractionReason=Website responded to DNS/TLS checks, but Fraudly could not complete a public page fetch during this scan.
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Alerte Google sur les menaces
Google Web Risk a signalé cette URL comme potentiellement dangereuse.
Source : Google Web RiskFiabilité de la source: high
Schémas de risque détectés
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Aucune ligne de risque prioritaire supplémentaire au-delà des correspondances de listes.
Signaux utiles et observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages)Fiabilité de la source: low
Check unavailable
RDAP lookup overrun or error: RDAP provider timed out after 2500ms
Source : RDAPFiabilité de la source: low
Aucun signalement de phishing connu
Ce site n’était pas sur les listes de phishing connues dans ce scan. Les sites frauduleux apparaissent vite—ce n’est qu’un signal.
Source : OpenPhishFiabilité de la source: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source : URLhausFiabilité de la source: low
Domaine et enregistrement
- URL/nom d’hôte vérifié : 1775xx.com
- Domaine enregistré : 1775xx.com
- Date d’enregistrement : inconnu
- Âge du domaine : Unavailable
- Registrar : inconnu
- Pays : inconnu
- Date d’expiration : inconnu
- Confidentialité / indications de propriété masquées : non / inconnu
Source : RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://1775xx.com/
- Final URL: https://1775xx.com/
- Final domain: 1775xx.com
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: non
- Redirect resolver note: redirect_fetch_failed
Contrôles de sécurité (HTTPS / certificats)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: oui
- Certificate trusted in probe: non
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: non / inconnu
- Issuer: localhost
- Expiry: 2025-06-20T14:14:20.000Z
Source : TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
Google Web Risk flagged this URL as potentially unsafe.phishingmatched
This URL appears in Google's threat intelligence for malware, phishing, or unwanted software (SOCIAL_ENGINEERING).
Source : Google Web Risk · severity: danger · fiabilité: high
TLS certificate validation issuesslmatched
HTTPS is reachable but the certificate did not validate as trusted or may be expired. Issuer: localhost. Expiry: 2025-06-20T14:14:20.000Z.
Source : TLS certificate check · severity: warning · fiabilité: medium
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source : Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · fiabilité: low
Check unavailabledomainno match
RDAP lookup overrun or error: RDAP provider timed out after 2500ms
Source : RDAP · severity: info · fiabilité: low
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source : OpenPhish · severity: info · fiabilité: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source : URLhaus · severity: info · fiabilité: low
Enrichissement de réputation
Passage réputation élargie optionnelle si disponible—au-delà des sondes de base rapides.
Aucun profil de réputation enrichi. Cela limite le contexte ; cela ne prouve pas que le site est dangereux.
Sondes d’avis rapides (scan de base)
Contrôles d’annuaires légers pour le modèle—les ratés décrivent notre instantané, pas l’honnêteté du site.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No public review profile was found. This limits confidence but does not prove the site is unsafe.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Signaux d’exécution
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
Détail du score (avancé)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Signaux de score combinés (avis, réputation, flux, exécution…)
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
- Google Safe Browsing match (+45 raw · high confidence) — Google Safe Browsing reported phishing (exact url).
Observations site et techniques
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
Schémas de risque détectés
- TLS certificate validation issue (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Certificate failed validation against trust anchors.
Données incomplètes ou indisponibles
- Domain registration age unavailable (+0 raw · low confidence) — Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal.
- Domain ownership could not be verified from public registration data (+1 raw · low confidence) — WHOIS/RDAP did not expose corroboratable registrant signals in this crawl. That is common and mainly reduces how confidently we can score—not evidence of impersonation by itself.
Pondération renseignement arnaque (modèle)
Correspondances renseignement arnaque
- Google Safe Browsing match (+45 raw · high confidence) — Google Safe Browsing reported phishing (exact url). · Google Safe Browsing
Schémas de risque détectés
- TLS certificate validation issue (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Certificate failed validation against trust anchors. · TLS certificate check
Notes collecteur d’avis (neutre)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Facteurs clés expliqués
Notes combinées de motifs détectés, score arnaque et aide IA optionnelle—pas un conseil juridique ou financier.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- Domain length looks normal.
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
AI model used in this run: non
