Sicherheitsbewertung
95 / 100
Die Sicherheitsbewertung kombiniert technische Prüfungen, Reputationssignale, Website-Historie, Scam-Informationen und KI-Analyse.
Signale hinter Ihrer Bewertung
Limited verification
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=708561
Treffer aus Scam-Informationen
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
In diesem Scan wurden keine bekannten Phishing-, Malware- oder Polizei-Warnungen gefunden.
Erkannte Risikomuster
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Keine zusätzlichen priorisierten Risikozeilen über kuratierte Listen-Treffer hinaus.
Hilfreiche Signale & Beobachtungen
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 11306 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): uber.com. Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2028-07-13T04:00:00.000Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Kein bekannter Phishing-Bericht gefunden
Diese Website wurde in diesem Scan nicht in bekannten Phishing-Listen gefunden. Neue Betrugsseiten entstehen schnell—dies ist nur ein Signal.
Quelle: OpenPhishQuellenzuverlässigkeit: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhausQuellenzuverlässigkeit: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2027-02-16T23:59:59.000Z.
Quelle: TLS certificate checkQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Quelle: Fraudly redirect analysisQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Older domain registration
The domain has been registered for roughly 30 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: medium
Domain & Registrierung
- Geprüfte URL/Hostname: uber.com
- Registrierte Domain: uber.com
- Registrierungsdatum: 1995-07-14T04:00:00.000Z
- Domain-Alter: 30 Jahre, 11 Monate, 26 Tage
- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.
- Land: unbekannt
- Ablaufdatum: 2028-07-13T04:00:00.000Z
- Datenschutz / anonymisierte Inhaberhinweise: nein / unbekannt
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://uber.com/
- Final URL: https://www.uber.com/
- Final domain: uber.com
- Redirect count: 1
- Crossed registrable domain: nein
- https://www.uber.com/
Sicherheitsprüfungen (HTTPS / Zertifikate)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: ja
- Certificate trusted in probe: ja
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: nein / unbekannt
- Issuer: DigiCert Inc
- Expiry: 2027-02-16T23:59:59.000Z
Quelle: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 11306 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): uber.com. Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2028-07-13T04:00:00.000Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Quelle: OpenPhish · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhaus · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2027-02-16T23:59:59.000Z.
Quelle: TLS certificate check · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
Older domain registrationdomainno match
The domain has been registered for roughly 30 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: positive · Zuverlässigkeit: medium
Redirect chain detecteddomainmatched
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Quelle: Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
Reputationsanreicherung
Optionaler breiterer Reputationsdurchlauf wenn verfügbar—über die schnellen Basisprobes hinaus.
Kein angereichertes Reputationsprofil. Das begrenzt den Kontext; es beweist keine Unsicherheit.
Schnelle Review-Sonden (Basisscan)
Leichte Verzeichnisprüfungen für das Modell—Ausfälle beschreiben unseren Snapshot, nicht die Seriosität des Shops.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Verified
VerifiedGoogle Reviews
★★☆☆☆2.4 / 5
Based on 11 reviews
Wait more save more is a scam , I had time so I thought why not to wait and save money
Driver are making the root longer to turn the estimation to their money expectations, I did not realise this till I was double cha…
Poor public reputation
Mixed reviews — check delivery, returns and policy before ordering
Wait more save more is a scam , I had time so I thought why not to wait and save money
Driver are making the root longer to turn the estimation to their money expectations, I did not realise this till I was double cha…
- No reliable public review data found
Public review data was included in this analysis.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment-Signale
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 2 segments / 2558 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoring-Details (erweitert)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Kombinierte Scoring-Signale (Bewertungen, Reputation, Feeds, Fulfillment…)
Vertrauenspositive Signale
- About the business (-2 raw · medium confidence) — About the business
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Uber.
- Long-established domain registration (-16 raw · high confidence) — Domain has been registered for roughly 31 years—a strong legitimacy signal.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Website- und technische Beobachtungen
- Below-average Google reviews (+3 raw · low confidence) — Mixed customer experiences reported. Check reviews, delivery times and return policy before ordering. (Google 2.4 / 11 reviews).
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Erkannte Risikomuster
- No clear business address on shop pages (+14 raw · medium confidence) — Enough shop text was captured but no obvious business or return address was found—this matters more when you may pay or share delivery details.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — Commercial shop detected with very few policy or legal pages visible.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
Gewichtung Scam-Informationen (Modell)
No weighted intel contributions in this run.
Hinweise Review-Sammler (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Schlüsselfaktoren erklärt
Gemischte Hinweise aus Mustern, Scam-Scoring und optionaler KI—keine Rechts- oder Finanzberatung.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- Domain length looks normal.
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
AI model used in this run: nein
