Sicherheitsbewertung
66 / 100
Die Sicherheitsbewertung kombiniert technische Prüfungen, Reputationssignale, Website-Historie, Scam-Informationen und KI-Analyse.
Signale hinter Ihrer Bewertung
Limited verification
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=1040
Treffer aus Scam-Informationen
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
In diesem Scan wurden keine bekannten Phishing-, Malware- oder Polizei-Warnungen gefunden.
Erkannte Risikomuster
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Keine zusätzlichen priorisierten Risikozeilen über kuratierte Listen-Treffer hinaus.
Hilfreiche Signale & Beobachtungen
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: low
Domain age from prior successful lookup
Approximate domain age: 7 days (from cache). Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. Last successful lookup: 2026-06-25T17:12:38.898Z.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: medium
Kein bekannter Phishing-Bericht gefunden
Diese Website wurde in diesem Scan nicht in bekannten Phishing-Listen gefunden. Neue Betrugsseiten entstehen schnell—dies ist nur ein Signal.
Quelle: OpenPhishQuellenzuverlässigkeit: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhausQuellenzuverlässigkeit: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Google Trust Services. Expiry: 2026-09-16T01:34:53.000Z.
Quelle: TLS certificate checkQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Domain & Registrierung
- Geprüfte URL/Hostname: brickla.top
- Registrierte Domain: brickla.top
- Registrierungsdatum: 2026-06-18T00:24:34.000Z
- Domain-Alter: 7 days — last verified earlier
- Registrar: PDR Ltd.
- Land: unbekannt
- Ablaufdatum: unbekannt
- Datenschutz / anonymisierte Inhaberhinweise: nein / unbekannt
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org) (cached)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://brickla.top/
- Final URL: https://brickla.top/
- Final domain: brickla.top
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: nein
Sicherheitsprüfungen (HTTPS / Zertifikate)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: ja
- Certificate trusted in probe: ja
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: nein / unbekannt
- Issuer: Google Trust Services
- Expiry: 2026-09-16T01:34:53.000Z
Quelle: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
Domain age from prior successful lookupdomainno match
Approximate domain age: 7 days (from cache). Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. Last successful lookup: 2026-06-25T17:12:38.898Z.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: medium
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Quelle: OpenPhish · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhaus · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Google Trust Services. Expiry: 2026-09-16T01:34:53.000Z.
Quelle: TLS certificate check · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
Reputationsanreicherung
Optionaler breiterer Reputationsdurchlauf wenn verfügbar—über die schnellen Basisprobes hinaus.
Kein angereichertes Reputationsprofil. Das begrenzt den Kontext; es beweist keine Unsicherheit.
Schnelle Review-Sonden (Basisscan)
Leichte Verzeichnisprüfungen für das Modell—Ausfälle beschreiben unseren Snapshot, nicht die Seriosität des Shops.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No public review profile was found. This limits confidence but does not prove the site is unsafe.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment-Signale
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 1 segments / 7 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoring-Details (erweitert)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
"Trusted" was withheld because reputation or RDAP lifecycle evidence did not independently anchor identity for this snapshot.
Kombinierte Scoring-Signale (Bewertungen, Reputation, Feeds, Fulfillment…)
Vertrauenspositive Signale
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Brickla.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
Website- und technische Beobachtungen
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
- Limited public history (young domain) (+4 raw · low confidence) — This website is relatively new, so there is limited public history. (about 7 days).
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Erkannte Risikomuster
- High-disposable TLD pattern (+10 raw · medium confidence) — The apex sits on a commoditized TLD (.top) that is over-represented in throwaway hosts; still not proof of abuse by itself.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
- Very new registration (RDAP) (+12 raw · high confidence) — RDAP-derived domain age ≈ 7 days.
Unvollständige oder fehlende Daten
- Domain age from prior successful lookup (+0 raw · low confidence) — RDAP was unavailable this scan, but Fraudly reused a recent successful registration snapshot so scores stay stable.
Gewichtung Scam-Informationen (Modell)
Erkannte Risikomuster
- Very new registration (RDAP) (+12 raw · high confidence) — RDAP-derived domain age ≈ 7 days. · RDAP (rdap.org) (cached)
Hinweise Review-Sammler (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Schlüsselfaktoren erklärt
Gemischte Hinweise aus Mustern, Scam-Scoring und optionaler KI—keine Rechts- oder Finanzberatung.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- Domain length looks normal.
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
AI model used in this run: nein
