Sicherheitsbewertung
20 / 100
Die Sicherheitsbewertung kombiniert technische Prüfungen, Reputationssignale, Website-Historie, Scam-Informationen und KI-Analyse.
Autoritative Scam-Informationen überschreiben den Kopfwert, damit die Empfehlung vorsichtig bleibt, wenn Feeds vom Modell abweichen.
Signale hinter Ihrer Bewertung
Bestätigtes Phishing-Risiko
Availability: unavailable · Site unavailable: no HTTP response received.
Inspection: failed · dns=true · tls=false · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=0 · extractionReason=No HTTP response received.
Treffer aus Scam-Informationen
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Bekannter Phishing-Bericht gefunden
Diese Website wurde in diesem Scan in bekannten Phishing-Listen gefunden.
Quelle: OpenPhishQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Erkannte Risikomuster
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
HTTPS/TLS connection not established
A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully in this probe.
Quelle: TLS certificate checkQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Hilfreiche Signale & Beobachtungen
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 762 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): aitptest.com. Registrar: OnlineNIC, Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-24T14:54:01.000Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: high
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhausQuellenzuverlässigkeit: low
Domain & Registrierung
- Geprüfte URL/Hostname: aitptest.com
- Registrierte Domain: aitptest.com
- Registrierungsdatum: 2024-05-24T14:54:01.000Z
- Domain-Alter: 2 Jahre, 1 Monat, 2 Tage
- Registrar: OnlineNIC, Inc.
- Land: unbekannt
- Ablaufdatum: 2027-05-24T14:54:01.000Z
- Datenschutz / anonymisierte Inhaberhinweise: nein / unbekannt
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://aitptest.com/
- Final URL: https://aitptest.com/
- Final domain: aitptest.com
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: nein
- Redirect resolver note: redirect_fetch_failed
Sicherheitsprüfungen (HTTPS / Zertifikate)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: nein
- Certificate trusted in probe: nein
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: nein / unbekannt
- Issuer: unbekannt
- Expiry: unbekannt
Quelle: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
Listed in OpenPhish public feedphishingmatched
This host or URL appears on the OpenPhish feed used in this check. Treat as a risk indicator aligned with phishing intelligence.
Quelle: OpenPhish · severity: danger · Zuverlässigkeit: high
HTTPS/TLS connection not establishedsslmatched
A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully in this probe.
Quelle: TLS certificate check · severity: danger · Zuverlässigkeit: high
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 762 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): aitptest.com. Registrar: OnlineNIC, Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-24T14:54:01.000Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhaus · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
Reputationsanreicherung
Optionaler breiterer Reputationsdurchlauf wenn verfügbar—über die schnellen Basisprobes hinaus.
Kein angereichertes Reputationsprofil. Das begrenzt den Kontext; es beweist keine Unsicherheit.
Schnelle Review-Sonden (Basisscan)
Leichte Verzeichnisprüfungen für das Modell—Ausfälle beschreiben unseren Snapshot, nicht die Seriosität des Shops.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No public review profile was found. This limits confidence but does not prove the site is unsafe.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment-Signale
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
Scoring-Details (erweitert)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Kombinierte Scoring-Signale (Bewertungen, Reputation, Feeds, Fulfillment…)
Treffer aus Scam-Informationen
- OpenPhish match (+35 raw · high confidence) — OpenPhish reported phishing (hostname).
Vertrauenspositive Signale
- Domain over one year old (-4 raw · low confidence) — More than a year of registration history slightly reduces throwaway-domain concern.
- Mail exchangers with SPF or DMARC (-3 raw · low confidence) — MX exists and at least SPF or DMARC is published—common for serious domains and slightly reassuring when intel is incomplete.
Website- und technische Beobachtungen
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Erkannte Risikomuster
- No reliable HTTPS endpoint (+22 raw · high confidence) — Port 443 probe did not complete a TLS session.
Gewichtung Scam-Informationen (Modell)
Treffer aus Scam-Informationen
- OpenPhish match (+35 raw · high confidence) — OpenPhish reported phishing (hostname). · OpenPhish
Erkannte Risikomuster
- No reliable HTTPS endpoint (+22 raw · high confidence) — Port 443 probe did not complete a TLS session. · TLS certificate check
Hinweise Review-Sammler (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Schlüsselfaktoren erklärt
Gemischte Hinweise aus Mustern, Scam-Scoring und optionaler KI—keine Rechts- oder Finanzberatung.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- Domain length looks normal.
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
AI model used in this run: nein
