Sicherheitsbewertung
79 / 100
Die Sicherheitsbewertung kombiniert technische Prüfungen, Reputationssignale, Website-Historie, Scam-Informationen und KI-Analyse.
Signale hinter Ihrer Bewertung
Limited verification
Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=13
Treffer aus Scam-Informationen
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
In diesem Scan wurden keine bekannten Phishing-, Malware- oder Polizei-Warnungen gefunden.
Erkannte Risikomuster
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Keine zusätzlichen priorisierten Risikozeilen über kuratierte Listen-Treffer hinaus.
Hilfreiche Signale & Beobachtungen
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
Subdomain submitted; root registration also checked
The submitted host 121jio.senes.at is a subdomain. Fraudly checks RDAP/domain-age on senes.at because ownership and registration belong to the registrable root domain.
Quelle: Fraudly hostname analysisQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: low
Domain registration age unavailable
Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. HTTP 404
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)Quellenzuverlässigkeit: low
Kein bekannter Phishing-Bericht gefunden
Diese Website wurde in diesem Scan nicht in bekannten Phishing-Listen gefunden. Neue Betrugsseiten entstehen schnell—dies ist nur ein Signal.
Quelle: OpenPhishQuellenzuverlässigkeit: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhausQuellenzuverlässigkeit: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-07-12T13:35:18.000Z.
Quelle: TLS certificate checkQuellenzuverlässigkeit: high
Domain & Registrierung
Die eingegebene Adresse ist eine Subdomain. Fraudly prüfte auch die registrierte Domain, da Alter und Eigentum zur Root-Domain gehören.
- Geprüfte URL/Hostname: 121jio.senes.at
- Registrierte Domain: senes.at
- Registrierungsdatum: unbekannt
- Domain-Alter: Domain age unavailable — not treated as a risk signal.
- Registrar: unbekannt
- Land: unbekannt
- Ablaufdatum: unbekannt
- Datenschutz / anonymisierte Inhaberhinweise: nein / unbekannt
- Subdomain-Analyse: Keine Hochrisiko-Formulierung in Subdomain-Labels.
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://121jio.senes.at/
- Final URL: https://121jio.senes.at/
- Final domain: 121jio.senes.at
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: nein
Sicherheitsprüfungen (HTTPS / Zertifikate)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: ja
- Certificate trusted in probe: ja
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: nein / unbekannt
- Issuer: Let's Encrypt
- Expiry: 2026-07-12T13:35:18.000Z
Quelle: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
Subdomain submitted; root registration also checkeddomainno match
The submitted host 121jio.senes.at is a subdomain. Fraudly checks RDAP/domain-age on senes.at because ownership and registration belong to the registrable root domain.
Quelle: Fraudly hostname analysis · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Quelle: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
Domain registration age unavailabledomainno match
Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. HTTP 404
Quelle: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Quelle: OpenPhish · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Quelle: URLhaus · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-07-12T13:35:18.000Z.
Quelle: TLS certificate check · severity: info · Zuverlässigkeit: high
Reputationsanreicherung
Optionaler breiterer Reputationsdurchlauf wenn verfügbar—über die schnellen Basisprobes hinaus.
Kein angereichertes Reputationsprofil. Das begrenzt den Kontext; es beweist keine Unsicherheit.
Schnelle Review-Sonden (Basisscan)
Leichte Verzeichnisprüfungen für das Modell—Ausfälle beschreiben unseren Snapshot, nicht die Seriosität des Shops.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
Independent customer review data is unavailable, and there are mixed signals regarding the site's legitimacy.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment-Signale
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 1 segments / 13 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoring-Details (erweitert)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 82/100 displayed trust.
"Trusted" was withheld because reputation or RDAP lifecycle evidence did not independently anchor identity for this snapshot.
Kombinierte Scoring-Signale (Bewertungen, Reputation, Feeds, Fulfillment…)
Vertrauenspositive Signale
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Senes.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
Website- und technische Beobachtungen
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
Unvollständige oder fehlende Daten
- Domain registration age unavailable (+0 raw · low confidence) — Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal.
- Domain ownership could not be verified from public registration data (+1 raw · low confidence) — WHOIS/RDAP did not expose corroboratable registrant signals in this crawl. That is common and mainly reduces how confidently we can score—not evidence of impersonation by itself.
Gewichtung Scam-Informationen (Modell)
No weighted intel contributions in this run.
Hinweise Review-Sammler (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Schlüsselfaktoren erklärt
Gemischte Hinweise aus Mustern, Scam-Scoring und optionaler KI—keine Rechts- oder Finanzberatung.
- AI risk signal: medium
- No reliable public review data found, indicating a lack of independent customer feedback.
- Domain registration age could not be verified, which reduces confidence in the site's legitimacy.
AI model used in this run: ja
