Signals behind your score
Website Not Available
Availability: unavailable · Site unavailable: no HTTP response received.
Inspection: failed · dns=true · tls=false · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=0 · extractionReason=No HTTP response received.
Matches from scam intelligence
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
No known phishing, malware, or police-aligned scam warnings were found in this scan.
Detected risk patterns
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
No additional prioritized risk rows were raised beyond curated list matches.
Helpful signals & observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
Subdomain submitted; root registration also checked
The submitted host request-reviews.business-minange.com is a subdomain. Fraudly checks RDAP/domain-age on business-minange.com because ownership and registration belong to the registrable root domain.
Source: Fraudly hostname analysisSource reliability: high
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages)Source reliability: low
Check unavailable
RDAP lookup overrun or error: RDAP provider timed out after 2500ms
Source: RDAPSource reliability: low
No known phishing report found
This website was not found in known phishing threat lists during this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.
Source: OpenPhishSource reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source: URLhausSource reliability: low
Domain & registration
The submitted address is a subdomain. Fraudly also checked the registered domain because domain age and ownership belong to the root domain.
- Checked URL/hostname: request-reviews.business-minange.com
- Registered domain: business-minange.com
- Registration date: unknown
- Domain age: Unavailable
- Registrar: unknown
- Country: unknown
- Expiration date: unknown
- Privacy / redacted ownership hints: no / unknown
- Subdomain analysis: No high-risk wording detected in subdomain labels.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://request-reviews.business-minange.com/
- Final URL: https://request-reviews.business-minange.com/
- Final domain: request-reviews.business-minange.com
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: no
- Redirect resolver note: redirect_fetch_failed
Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: yes
- Certificate trusted in probe: no
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: possible
- Issuer: aaa.whm
- Expiry: 2026-07-20T17:38:26.000Z
Source: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
TLS certificate validation issuesslmatched
HTTPS is reachable but the certificate did not validate as trusted or may be expired. The chain looks self-signed or untrusted by system roots. Issuer: aaa.whm. Expiry: 2026-07-20T17:38:26.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: warning · reliability: medium
Subdomain submitted; root registration also checkeddomainno match
The submitted host request-reviews.business-minange.com is a subdomain. Fraudly checks RDAP/domain-age on business-minange.com because ownership and registration belong to the registrable root domain.
Source: Fraudly hostname analysis · severity: info · reliability: high
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Check unavailabledomainno match
RDAP lookup overrun or error: RDAP provider timed out after 2500ms
Source: RDAP · severity: info · reliability: low
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
Reputation enrichment
Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.
No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.
Quick review probes (baseline scan)
Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Google Reviews · Unavailable
UnavailableGoogle Reviews
No public reviews found
- No reliable public review data found
No public review profile was found. This limits confidence but does not prove the site is unsafe.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment signals
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
Scoring detail (advanced)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 76/100 displayed trust.
Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)
Trust-positive signals
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Business Minange.
Website & technical observations
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
Detected risk patterns
- Unusually long domain (+10 raw · medium confidence) — The hostname is unusually long, which is common in phishing or throwaway shops.
- TLS certificate validation issue (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Likely untrusted / self-signed material.
Incomplete or unavailable data
- Domain registration age unavailable (+0 raw · low confidence) — Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal.
- Domain ownership could not be verified from public registration data (+1 raw · low confidence) — WHOIS/RDAP did not expose corroboratable registrant signals in this crawl. That is common and mainly reduces how confidently we can score—not evidence of impersonation by itself.
Scam intelligence weighting (model)
Detected risk patterns
- TLS certificate validation issue (+12 raw · medium confidence) — Likely untrusted / self-signed material. · TLS certificate check
Review collector notes (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Key factors explained
Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- The domain name is unusually long, a common phishing pattern.
- Not enough website text to assess supply chain.
AI model used in this run: no
