Trust score
95 / 100
The trust score combines technical checks, reputation signals where available, website history cues, scam intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis.
Signals behind your score
Highly Trusted
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: partial · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=85134
Matches from scam intelligence
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
No known phishing, malware, or police-aligned scam warnings were found in this scan.
Detected risk patterns
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
No additional prioritized risk rows were raised beyond curated list matches.
Helpful signals & observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages)Source reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 10544 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): google.com. Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2028-09-14T04:00:00.000Z. Name servers: NS1.GOOGLE.COM, NS2.GOOGLE.COM, NS3.GOOGLE.COM, NS4.GOOGLE.COM. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: high
No known phishing report found
This website was not found in known phishing threat lists during this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.
Source: OpenPhishSource reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source: URLhausSource reliability: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Google Trust Services. Expiry: 2026-09-21T08:37:24.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate checkSource reliability: high
Older domain registration
The domain has been registered for roughly 28 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: medium
Domain & registration
- Checked URL/hostname: google.com
- Registered domain: google.com
- Registration date: 1997-09-15T04:00:00.000Z
- Domain age: 28 years, 10 months, 24 days
- Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.
- Country: unknown
- Expiration date: 2028-09-14T04:00:00.000Z
- Privacy / redacted ownership hints: no / unknown
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://facebook-fake.blogspot.com/
- Final URL: https://www.google.com/sorry/index?continue=https://facebook-fake.blogspot.com/&q=EgQs3r-LGOvAqdMGIi2Q--uEeVSkse7yj8ZmsxduIFZovSGDxrIyE-XFG43Gk3zgvtdQtt8X9TA4bycyAnJSWgFD
- Final domain: google.com
- Redirect count: 1
- Crossed registrable domain: yes
- https://www.google.com/sorry/index?continue=https://facebook-fake.blogspot.com/&q=EgQs3r-LGOvAqdMGIi2Q--uEeVSkse7yj8ZmsxduIFZovSGDxrIyE-XFG43Gk3zgvtdQtt8X9TA4bycyAnJSWgFD
Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: yes
- Certificate trusted in probe: yes
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: no / unknown
- Issuer: Google Trust Services
- Expiry: 2026-09-21T08:37:24.000Z
Source: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 10544 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): google.com. Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2028-09-14T04:00:00.000Z. Name servers: NS1.GOOGLE.COM, NS2.GOOGLE.COM, NS3.GOOGLE.COM, NS4.GOOGLE.COM. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · reliability: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Google Trust Services. Expiry: 2026-09-21T08:37:24.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: info · reliability: high
Older domain registrationdomainno match
The domain has been registered for roughly 28 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: positive · reliability: medium
Redirect chain detecteddomainmatched
The entered website forwards visitors to a different registrable domain. Fraudly included the final destination in this scan.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: warning · reliability: high
Redirects to another domaindomainmatched
The entered website forwards visitors to a different domain. The final destination was included in this scan.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: warning · reliability: high
Reputation enrichment
Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.
No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.
Quick review probes (baseline scan)
Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
Not availableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Matched
MatchedGoogle Reviews
★★★½☆3.6 / 5
Based on 100 reviews
I agree with what a Mr. J.D. said in another review, except that while it is abhorrent behavior from Google and disgusting that it was approved by local governments, I am not surprised by the choices of Google. Data c…
Mixed public reputation
Used in trust score
- No reliable public review data found
Independent customer review data could not be verified, and the site has a low trust signal due to the absence of reliable reviews.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment signals
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 5 segments / 6812 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoring detail (advanced)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)
Trust-positive signals
- Contact information available (-3 raw · medium confidence) — A contact or reach-us section appears on the site.
- About the business (-2 raw · medium confidence) — About the business
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Google.
- Physical address signal (-4 raw · medium confidence) — Physical address signal
- Established payment provider (Google Pay) (-3 raw · medium confidence) — Established payment provider (Google Pay)
- Long-established domain registration (-16 raw · high confidence) — Domain has been registered for roughly 29 years—a strong legitimacy signal.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Website & technical observations
- Mixed Google review signal (-1 raw · low confidence) — Google rating 3.6 across 100 reviews lowers risk proportionally to volume and rating quality.
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Detected risk patterns
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — Commercial shop detected with very few policy or legal pages visible.
- Recognized official brand domain (-6 raw · high confidence) — This domain matches a known official domain for Google.
- Redirects to another domain (+8 raw · high confidence) — The entered website forwards visitors to a different domain. The final destination was included in this scan.
Scam intelligence weighting (model)
No weighted intel contributions in this run.
Review collector notes (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Key factors explained
Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.
- AI risk signal: high
- The website redirects to another domain, which is a significant risk indicator.
- No reliable public review data was found, indicating a lack of transparency.
AI model used in this run: yes
