Veiligheidsscore
56 / 100
De veiligheidsscore combineert technische controles, reputatiesignalen, websitegeschiedenis, scam-informatie en AI-analyse.
Signalen achter uw score
Limited verification
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=806906
Matches uit scam-informatie
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Geen bekende phishing-, malware- of politiewaarschuwingen gevonden in deze scan.
Gedetecteerde risicopatronen
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Geen extra geprioriteerde risicorijen buiten gecureerde lijstmatches.
Nuttige signalen en observaties
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Bron: Dutch Police (public pages)Betrouwbaarheid bron: low
Domain registration age unavailable
Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. HTTP 429
Bron: RDAP (rdap.org)Betrouwbaarheid bron: low
Geen bekende phishingmelding gevonden
Deze website stond niet op bekende phishinglijsten in deze scan. Nieuwe scam-sites verschijnen snel—dit is één signaal onder meer.
Bron: OpenPhishBetrouwbaarheid bron: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Bron: URLhausBetrouwbaarheid bron: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-09-11T21:47:03.000Z.
Bron: TLS certificate checkBetrouwbaarheid bron: high
Domein & registratie
- Gecontroleerde URL/hostnaam: kissofaroma.shop
- Geregistreerd domein: kissofaroma.shop
- Registratiedatum: onbekend
- Domeinleeftijd: Domain age unavailable — not treated as a risk signal.
- Registrar: onbekend
- Land: onbekend
- Vervaldatum: onbekend
- Privacy / afgeschermde eigenaarsgegevens: nee / onbekend
Bron: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://kissofaroma.shop/
- Final URL: https://kissofaroma.shop/
- Final domain: kissofaroma.shop
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: nee
Beveiligingscontroles (HTTPS / certificaten)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: ja
- Certificate trusted in probe: ja
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: nee / onbekend
- Issuer: Let's Encrypt
- Expiry: 2026-09-11T21:47:03.000Z
Bron: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Bron: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: low
Domain registration age unavailabledomainno match
Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. HTTP 429
Bron: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: low
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Bron: OpenPhish · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Bron: URLhaus · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-09-11T21:47:03.000Z.
Bron: TLS certificate check · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: high
Reputatieverrijking
Optionele bredere reputatiepass wanneer beschikbaar—naast de snelle basisprobes.
Geen verrijkt reputatieprofiel gevonden. Dat beperkt context; het bewijst niet dat de site onveilig is.
Snelle reviewprobes (basisscan)
Lichte directorycontroles voor het model—problemen hier beschrijven onze snapshot, niet de eerlijkheid van de winkel.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No public review profile was found. This limits confidence but does not prove the site is unsafe.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment-signalen
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 4 segments / 4023 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoredetails (geavanceerd)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 82/100 displayed trust.
Gecombineerde scoresignalen (reviews, reputatie, feeds, fulfillment…)
Vertrouwen-positieve signalen
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Kissofaroma.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.
Website- en technische observaties
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
Gedetecteerde risicopatronen
- High-disposable TLD pattern (+10 raw · medium confidence) — The apex sits on a commoditized TLD (.shop) that is over-represented in throwaway hosts; still not proof of abuse by itself.
- No clear business address on shop pages (+14 raw · medium confidence) — Enough shop text was captured but no obvious business or return address was found—this matters more when you may pay or share delivery details.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — Commercial shop detected with very few policy or legal pages visible.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
- Possible dropshipping pattern (+2 raw · low confidence) — Possible dropshipping or social-ad webshop pattern (generic product catalog, vague shipping or return policy, limited company identity) — shopping confidence caution, not a fraud verdict.
- Review source unavailable in this scan (+0 raw · medium confidence) — Review APIs timed out or failed — verification confidence is reduced without treating missing data as positive reputation.
Onvolledige of ontbrekende gegevens
- Domain registration age unavailable (+0 raw · low confidence) — Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal.
- Domain ownership could not be verified from public registration data (+1 raw · low confidence) — WHOIS/RDAP did not expose corroboratable registrant signals in this crawl. That is common and mainly reduces how confidently we can score—not evidence of impersonation by itself.
Gewicht scam-informatie (model)
No weighted intel contributions in this run.
Notities reviewverzamelaar (neutraal)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Belangrijkste factoren uitgelegd
Gemengde notities uit patronen, scam-informatiescores en optionele AI—geen juridisch of financieel advies.
- No common bait keywords were found in the domain.
- Domain length looks normal.
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
AI model used in this run: nee
