Veiligheidsscore
66 / 100
De veiligheidsscore combineert technische controles, reputatiesignalen, websitegeschiedenis, scam-informatie en AI-analyse.
Signalen achter uw score
Limited verification
Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=1198
Matches uit scam-informatie
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
Geen bekende phishing-, malware- of politiewaarschuwingen gevonden in deze scan.
Gedetecteerde risicopatronen
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
Geen extra geprioriteerde risicorijen buiten gecureerde lijstmatches.
Nuttige signalen en observaties
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Bron: Dutch Police (public pages)Betrouwbaarheid bron: low
Check unavailable
RDAP lookup overrun or error: WhoisXML guardrails unavailable (20260618070000_whoisxml_usage_guardrails): ❌ Migration missing - falling back to memory cache. Run: npm run db:migrate:deploy
Bron: RDAPBetrouwbaarheid bron: low
Geen bekende phishingmelding gevonden
Deze website stond niet op bekende phishinglijsten in deze scan. Nieuwe scam-sites verschijnen snel—dit is één signaal onder meer.
Bron: OpenPhishBetrouwbaarheid bron: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Bron: URLhausBetrouwbaarheid bron: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-06T21:34:26.000Z.
Bron: TLS certificate checkBetrouwbaarheid bron: high
Domein & registratie
- Gecontroleerde URL/hostnaam: iglarchiv.de
- Geregistreerd domein: iglarchiv.de
- Registratiedatum: onbekend
- Domeinleeftijd: Unavailable
- Registrar: onbekend
- Land: onbekend
- Vervaldatum: onbekend
- Privacy / afgeschermde eigenaarsgegevens: nee / onbekend
Bron: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://iglarchiv.de/
- Final URL: https://iglarchiv.de/
- Final domain: iglarchiv.de
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: nee
Beveiligingscontroles (HTTPS / certificaten)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: ja
- Certificate trusted in probe: ja
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: nee / onbekend
- Issuer: Let's Encrypt
- Expiry: 2026-08-06T21:34:26.000Z
Bron: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Bron: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: low
Check unavailabledomainno match
RDAP lookup overrun or error: WhoisXML guardrails unavailable (20260618070000_whoisxml_usage_guardrails): ❌ Migration missing - falling back to memory cache. Run: npm run db:migrate:deploy
Bron: RDAP · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: low
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Bron: OpenPhish · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Bron: URLhaus · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Let's Encrypt. Expiry: 2026-08-06T21:34:26.000Z.
Bron: TLS certificate check · severity: info · betrouwbaarheid: high
Reputatieverrijking
Optionele bredere reputatiepass wanneer beschikbaar—naast de snelle basisprobes.
Geen verrijkt reputatieprofiel gevonden. Dat beperkt context; het bewijst niet dat de site onveilig is.
Snelle reviewprobes (basisscan)
Lichte directorycontroles voor het model—problemen hier beschrijven onze snapshot, niet de eerlijkheid van de winkel.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
Independent customer review data could not be verified, and no Google or Trustpilot listings matched this domain.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment-signalen
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 2 segments / 193 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoredetails (geavanceerd)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 82/100 displayed trust.
"Trusted" was withheld because reputation or RDAP lifecycle evidence did not independently anchor identity for this snapshot.
Gecombineerde scoresignalen (reviews, reputatie, feeds, fulfillment…)
Vertrouwen-positieve signalen
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Iglarchiv.
- Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
- Mail exchangers with SPF or DMARC (-3 raw · low confidence) — MX exists and at least SPF or DMARC is published—common for serious domains and slightly reassuring when intel is incomplete.
Website- en technische observaties
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
Gedetecteerde risicopatronen
- No business address in snippet (+5 raw · low confidence) — No obvious physical address in the captured text; for blogs, SaaS landing pages and portfolios that is often normal.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
Onvolledige of ontbrekende gegevens
- Domain registration age unavailable (+0 raw · low confidence) — Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal.
- Domain ownership could not be verified from public registration data (+1 raw · low confidence) — WHOIS/RDAP did not expose corroboratable registrant signals in this crawl. That is common and mainly reduces how confidently we can score—not evidence of impersonation by itself.
Gewicht scam-informatie (model)
No weighted intel contributions in this run.
Notities reviewverzamelaar (neutraal)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Belangrijkste factoren uitgelegd
Gemengde notities uit patronen, scam-informatiescores en optionele AI—geen juridisch of financieel advies.
- AI risk signal: medium
- No reliable public review data found, indicating a lack of independent customer feedback.
- Absence of a clear contact or support channel raises concerns about business legitimacy.
AI model used in this run: ja
