Likely trustworthy
stackoverflow.com
Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.
Coverage: Good · 79/100
Older infoMatched
Domain / website
Community snapshot · anonymized summaries
Recent public website checks run through Fraudly. This feed highlights sites people are actively verifying—one row per domain, sorted by last activity. Admin scan logs list every completed consumer check and may show more events.
Scores are generated automatically using trust, reputation where available, technical checks, scam intelligence feeds, and AI-assisted analysis—not a verdict on goodness or badness by itself.
stackoverflow.com
Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.
Coverage: Good · 79/100
Domain / website
snowflake.com
Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.
Coverage: Good · 79/100
Domain / website
sap.com
Mixed signals were found — proceed carefully.
Coverage: Good · 79/100
Domain / website
roblox.com
Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.
Coverage: Good · 72/100
Domain / website
reuters.com
Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.
Coverage: Good · 72/100
Domain / website
python.org
Mixed signals were found — proceed carefully.
Coverage: Good · 69/100
Domain / website
smooci.com
Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.
Coverage: Good · 79/100
Domain / website
reeffshop.it.com
Mixed signals were found — proceed carefully.
Coverage: Good · 71/100
Domain / website
sneaker-trends.com
Not enough reliable public evidence for a stronger recommendation.
Coverage: Good · 72/100
Domain / website
cutt.ly
Known platform with supporting positive signals.
Coverage: Good · 78/100
Domain / website
© 2026 Fraudly. All rights reserved.