Trust score
79 / 100
The trust score combines technical checks, reputation signals where available, website history cues, scam intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis.
Signals behind your score
Limited verification
Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=false · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=3565
Matches from scam intelligence
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
No known phishing, malware, or police-aligned scam warnings were found in this scan.
Detected risk patterns
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
HTTPS/TLS connection not established
A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully in this probe.
Source: TLS certificate checkSource reliability: high
Helpful signals & observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages)Source reliability: low
Domain age from prior successful lookup
Approximate domain age: 144 days (from cache). Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. Last successful lookup: 2026-06-08T20:48:58.886Z.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: medium
No known phishing report found
This website was not found in known phishing threat lists during this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.
Source: OpenPhishSource reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source: URLhausSource reliability: low
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysisSource reliability: high
Domain & registration
- Checked URL/hostname: moonlight9527.online
- Registered domain: moonlight9527.online
- Registration date: 2026-01-15T01:49:05.000Z
- Domain age: 4 months, 24 days — last verified earlier
- Registrar: DNSPod, Inc.
- Country: unknown
- Expiration date: unknown
- Privacy / redacted ownership hints: no / unknown
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) (cached)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: http://moonlight9527.online/
- Final URL: http://moonlight9527.online/login
- Final domain: moonlight9527.online
- Redirect count: 1
- Crossed registrable domain: no
- Redirect resolver note: redirect_fetch_failed
- http://moonlight9527.online/login
Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: no
- Certificate trusted in probe: no
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: no / unknown
- Issuer: unknown
- Expiry: unknown
Source: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
HTTPS/TLS connection not establishedsslmatched
A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully in this probe.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: danger · reliability: high
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Domain age from prior successful lookupdomainno match
Approximate domain age: 144 days (from cache). Domain registration age could not be verified during this scan. Some registries temporarily limit or omit registration data. This does not mean the website is suspicious, and it was not treated as a risk signal. Last successful lookup: 2026-06-08T20:48:58.886Z.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · reliability: medium
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
Redirect chain detecteddomainmatched
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: info · reliability: high
Reputation enrichment
Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.
No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.
Quick review probes (baseline scan)
Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
UnavailableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Not confidently linked
Limited dataGoogle Reviews
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
Not confidently linked
We found possible review data, but could not confidently link it to this domain.
- No reliable public review data found
No reliable public review data found, indicating a lack of independent customer feedback.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment signals
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 3 segments / 66 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoring detail (advanced)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
"Trusted" was withheld because reputation or RDAP lifecycle evidence did not independently anchor identity for this snapshot.
Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)
Trust-positive signals
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Moonlight9527.
Website & technical observations
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
- Domain under one year old (+1 raw · low confidence) — Registration is less than a year old—a small uncertainty nudge, not a scam indicator on its own.
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
- Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.
Detected risk patterns
- Startup-style TLD pattern (+4 raw · low confidence) — The apex uses a trendy TLD (.online) seen in many harmless projects; Fraudly applies only a small nudge unless other spoofing cues appear.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.
- No reliable HTTPS endpoint (+22 raw · high confidence) — Port 443 probe did not complete a TLS session.
Incomplete or unavailable data
- Domain age from prior successful lookup (+0 raw · low confidence) — RDAP was unavailable this scan, but Fraudly reused a recent successful registration snapshot so scores stay stable.
Scam intelligence weighting (model)
Detected risk patterns
- No reliable HTTPS endpoint (+22 raw · high confidence) — Port 443 probe did not complete a TLS session. · TLS certificate check
Review collector notes (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Key factors explained
Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.
- AI risk signal: high
- A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully, indicating no reliable HTTPS endpoint.
- No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content, raising concerns about business legitimacy.
AI model used in this run: yes
