Trust Profile

Fraudly Trust Profile for healthcare.gov

Below is an automated, evidence-based snapshot of healthcare.gov showing risk indicators, trust signals, and technical checks. Results are not legal or financial advice and are not a guarantee that a site is safe or unsafe.

Looking for the long-form trust guide (FAQs, scam vs. legit framing)? Open the healthcare.gov trust intelligence page.

Snapshot only. Data comes from public feeds, technical checks, and limited page context. Phishing and scam sites change quickly—use your judgment and official channels when in doubt.

Loading detailed signals…

Check another website Latest public checks

Trust-style score
Domain age
Secure connection

Loading detailed signals…

Trust Profile

Fraudly Trust Profile for healthcare.gov

Looking for the long-form trust guide (FAQs, scam vs. legit framing)? Open the healthcare.gov trust intelligence page.

Snapshot only. Data comes from public feeds, technical checks, and limited page context. Phishing and scam sites change quickly—use your judgment and official channels when in doubt.

Last scanned by Fraudly scheduled verification

Limited public information available

No confirmed malicious indicators were detected. Public data availability was limited in this scan, which affects context completeness but is not a risk signal.

Trust rating

97/ 100

Likely trustworthy

Overall Trust Rating from Fraudly’s full evaluation. The dimension cards below explain specific evidence — they are not averaged into this score.

Would I trust this website?

Likely trustworthy

Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.

What influenced this result?

These categories explain the evidence behind the result. They are not separate verdicts and are not simply averaged into the Overall Trust Rating.

Website SafetyStrong evidence

Shopping SafetyUnavailable

—

Business LegitimacyStrong evidence

ReputationUnavailable

—

Fraudly's Summary

We found no confirmed technical threats during this scan, although some trust signals could not be fully verified.

Evidence found

No confirmed threat-list matches during this scan
Secure connection (HTTPS)

Information we could not verify

Business identity could not be sufficiently verified
Public reputation data was limited or unavailable
Some verification checks could not be completed

Recommendation

The site appears generally safe to use, but review the findings below before sharing sensitive information.

Fraudly Trust Profile

The overall Trust Rating uses Fraudly’s full evaluation. These dimension cards describe specific evidence categories. Unavailable dimensions are excluded — they are not treated as zero.

Is this website safe to visit?

95 / 100

This does not mean we found harmful software. It only means we could not finish every safety check this time.

Explain this score

Is this an official government website?

94 / 100

This looks like an official government or public website.

Explain this score

What do other customers say?

We couldn’t find enough independent customer reviews for this website.

Explain this score

How established is this website?

96 / 100

How long a website address has existed can help you decide how careful to be. Newer addresses need more caution.

Explain this score

How complete was our check?

94 / 100

Most applicable checks were completed successfully.

Explain this score

Public reputation

Trustpilot and Google review signals are always checked. Only reliable matches with enough reviews can influence the trust score.

Trustpilot · Unavailable

Not available

Trustpilot

No public reviews found

Checked, no public reviews found

Google Reviews · Couldn’t confirm this match

Limited info

Google Reviews

We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this exact website.

Couldn’t confirm this match

Why did Fraudly give these scores?

Here you can see exactly what we found, what we couldn’t confirm and how that affected each score.

Is this website safe to visit?

95 / 100

Why this score is high

What we found

We did not find this website on the warning lists we checked
The connection to this website is protected

We couldn’t check this at the moment

We could only check part of the website, so this result is based on limited information

Why this score

We could only finish some of the safety checks this time. That is why the Website Safety score is 95/100 rather than a high score.

What this means for you

This does not mean we found harmful software. It only means we could not finish every safety check this time.

Is this an official government website?

94 / 100

This looks like an official government or public website.

What do other customers say?

What we couldn’t confirm

We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this website

Why this score

We couldn’t find enough independent customer reviews to give a Reputation score.

What this means for you

We couldn’t find enough independent customer reviews for this website.

How established is this website?

96 / 100

Why this score is high

What we found

This website has existed for several years

Why this score

This website address has existed for a long time. That is why this score is high (96/100).

What this means for you

How long a website address has existed can help you decide how careful to be. Newer addresses need more caution.

View Website History

How complete was our check?

94 / 100

Most applicable checks were completed successfully.

Website History

Registration information helps provide additional context about a website's history and longevity.

Registered: 29 June 2010
Website Age: 16 years, 6 days
Registration History: Consistent

This website has been registered for many years, providing a substantial operating history.

We evaluate websites using many independent trust signals. Registration history provides useful context, but it is only one part of the overall assessment.

Stay Safe Online

Short guides related to this result — they do not replace the score or methodology.

Full analysis completed

Completed

Verdict refined using reputation, threat intelligence and fraud signals.

Business Legitimacy

Business name presence — References Healthcare.

What we checked

Key checks from this scan, explained in plain language.

How Fraudly checks sites

Helpful findings

Business name presence — References Healthcare.
This website has existed for several years.
The connection to this website is protected.
No matches were found on major scam or phishing lists in this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.

Technical detailsFor people who want to see the underlying checks and technical information.

Trust score

97 / 100

The trust score combines technical checks, reputation signals where available, website history cues, scam intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis.

Signals behind your score

Highly Trusted

Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)

Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=421990

Matches from scam intelligence

Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.

No known phishing, malware, or police-aligned scam warnings were found in this scan.

Detected risk patterns

Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.

No additional prioritized risk rows were raised beyond curated list matches.

Helpful signals & observations

Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.

No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages)Source reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 5846 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): healthcare.gov. Registrar: get.gov. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-16T18:12:16.083Z. Name servers: a1-86.akam.net, a10-67.akam.net, a13-64.akam.net, a24-65.akam.net. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: high
No known phishing report found
This website was not found in known phishing threat lists during this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.
Source: OpenPhishSource reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source: URLhausSource reliability: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2026-12-21T23:59:59.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate checkSource reliability: high
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysisSource reliability: high
Older domain registration
The domain has been registered for roughly 16 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: medium

Domain & registration

Checked URL/hostname: healthcare.gov
Registered domain: healthcare.gov
Registration date: 2010-06-29T15:10:36.000Z
Domain age: 16 years, 6 days
Registrar: get.gov
Country: unknown
Expiration date: 2027-05-16T18:12:16.083Z
Privacy / redacted ownership hints: yes

Source: RDAP (rdap.org)

Redirect analysis

Original URL: https://healthcare.gov/
Final URL: https://www.healthcare.gov/
Final domain: healthcare.gov
Redirect count: 1
Crossed registrable domain: no

https://www.healthcare.gov/

Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)

HTTPS/TLS reachable: yes
Certificate trusted in probe: yes
Possibly self-signed / untrusted: no / unknown
Issuer: DigiCert Inc
Expiry: 2026-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

Source: TLS certificate check

Technical source details

Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.

Privacy-protected or redacted ownershipdomainmatched
RDAP entity fields suggest privacy or redaction. This is common and not proof of abuse.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · reliability: low
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 5846 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): healthcare.gov. Registrar: get.gov. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-16T18:12:16.083Z. Name servers: a1-86.akam.net, a10-67.akam.net, a13-64.akam.net, a24-65.akam.net. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · reliability: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2026-12-21T23:59:59.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: info · reliability: high
Older domain registrationdomainno match
The domain has been registered for roughly 16 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: positive · reliability: medium
Redirect chain detecteddomainmatched
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: info · reliability: high

Reputation enrichment

Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.

No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.

Quick review probes (baseline scan)

Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.

Trustpilot · Unavailable

Not available

Trustpilot

No public reviews found

Checked, no public reviews found

Google Reviews · Couldn’t confirm this match

Limited info

Google Reviews

We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this exact website.

Couldn’t confirm this match

No reliable public review data found

No reliable public review data was found, indicating a lack of independent customer feedback.

Public review data unavailable for this check.

Source availability (neutral)

Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).

Raw review snapshots

Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.

Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.

Fulfillment signals

Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence low · Score nudge: 0

Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
International shipping detected: unlikely
Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
Corpus: 2 segments / 13040 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: Marketplace terminology detected

No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.

Scoring detail (advanced)

Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.

Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.

Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)

Trust-positive signals

Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Healthcare.
Long-established domain registration (-16 raw · high confidence) — Domain has been registered for roughly 16 years—a strong legitimacy signal.
Established institutional-style domain (-10 raw · medium confidence) — The domain appears long-lived with stable naming patterns often seen on established service or institutional sites.
AI assessment: low risk (-4 raw · medium confidence) — AI summary suggested low narrative risk — this adjustment is capped so deterministic intel always dominates scoring.
Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.

Website & technical observations

No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.

Detected risk patterns

No business address in snippet (+5 raw · low confidence) — No obvious physical address in the captured text; for blogs, SaaS landing pages and portfolios that is often normal.
Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.

Incomplete or unavailable data

Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields.

Scam intelligence weighting (model)

Incomplete or unavailable data

Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields. · RDAP (rdap.org)

Review collector notes (neutral)

Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.

trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).

Key factors explained

Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.

AI risk signal: low
The domain healthcare.gov has been registered for approximately 16 years, which is a strong legitimacy signal.
The website uses HTTPS, ensuring a secure connection.

AI model used in this run: yes

Own this website?

Claim your website and show visitors that your site has completed Fraudly verification checks.

Fraudly Verified Website — This website has completed Fraudly verification checks.

Verify this badge at Fraudly.app/verify

Fraudly verification reflects available public reputation, security, and scam-intelligence checks at the time of scan. It is not a guarantee.

Download Fraudly Verified badge

Was this Trust Profile helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps improve Fraudly. It does not change this scan’s verdict.

Fraudly summarizes public scam intelligence, reputation snapshots, and technical signals for awareness. It is not legal, financial, or flawless security advice—verify important decisions yourself.

Loading detailed signals…

Check another website Latest public checks

healthcare.gov – Safe or Scam? Website Trust Report | Fraudly

Last scanned by Fraudly scheduled verification

Limited public information available

No confirmed malicious indicators were detected. Public data availability was limited in this scan, which affects context completeness but is not a risk signal.

Trust rating

97/ 100

Likely trustworthy

Overall Trust Rating from Fraudly’s full evaluation. The dimension cards below explain specific evidence — they are not averaged into this score.

Would I trust this website?

Likely trustworthy

Strong positive signals were found — use normal caution online.

What influenced this result?

These categories explain the evidence behind the result. They are not separate verdicts and are not simply averaged into the Overall Trust Rating.

Website SafetyStrong evidence

Shopping SafetyUnavailable

—

Business LegitimacyStrong evidence

ReputationUnavailable

—

Fraudly's Summary

We found no confirmed technical threats during this scan, although some trust signals could not be fully verified.

Evidence found

No confirmed threat-list matches during this scan
Secure connection (HTTPS)

Information we could not verify

Business identity could not be sufficiently verified
Public reputation data was limited or unavailable
Some verification checks could not be completed

Recommendation

The site appears generally safe to use, but review the findings below before sharing sensitive information.

Fraudly Trust Profile

The overall Trust Rating uses Fraudly’s full evaluation. These dimension cards describe specific evidence categories. Unavailable dimensions are excluded — they are not treated as zero.

Is this website safe to visit?

95 / 100

This does not mean we found harmful software. It only means we could not finish every safety check this time.

Explain this score

Is this an official government website?

94 / 100

This looks like an official government or public website.

Explain this score

What do other customers say?

We couldn’t find enough independent customer reviews for this website.

Explain this score

How established is this website?

96 / 100

How long a website address has existed can help you decide how careful to be. Newer addresses need more caution.

Explain this score

How complete was our check?

94 / 100

Most applicable checks were completed successfully.

Explain this score

Public reputation

Trustpilot and Google review signals are always checked. Only reliable matches with enough reviews can influence the trust score.

Trustpilot · Unavailable

Not available

Trustpilot

No public reviews found

Checked, no public reviews found

Google Reviews · Couldn’t confirm this match

Limited info

Google Reviews

We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this exact website.

Couldn’t confirm this match

Why did Fraudly give these scores?

Here you can see exactly what we found, what we couldn’t confirm and how that affected each score.

Is this website safe to visit?

95 / 100

Why this score is high

What we found

We did not find this website on the warning lists we checked
The connection to this website is protected

We couldn’t check this at the moment

We could only check part of the website, so this result is based on limited information

Why this score

We could only finish some of the safety checks this time. That is why the Website Safety score is 95/100 rather than a high score.

What this means for you

This does not mean we found harmful software. It only means we could not finish every safety check this time.

Is this an official government website?

94 / 100

This looks like an official government or public website.

What do other customers say?

What we couldn’t confirm

We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this website

Why this score

We couldn’t find enough independent customer reviews to give a Reputation score.

What this means for you

We couldn’t find enough independent customer reviews for this website.

How established is this website?

96 / 100

Why this score is high

What we found

This website has existed for several years

Why this score

This website address has existed for a long time. That is why this score is high (96/100).

What this means for you

How long a website address has existed can help you decide how careful to be. Newer addresses need more caution.

View Website History

How complete was our check?

94 / 100

Most applicable checks were completed successfully.

Website History

Registration information helps provide additional context about a website's history and longevity.

Registered: 29 June 2010
Website Age: 16 years, 6 days
Registration History: Consistent

This website has been registered for many years, providing a substantial operating history.

We evaluate websites using many independent trust signals. Registration history provides useful context, but it is only one part of the overall assessment.

Stay Safe Online

Short guides related to this result — they do not replace the score or methodology.

Full analysis completed

Completed

Verdict refined using reputation, threat intelligence and fraud signals.

Business Legitimacy

Business name presence — References Healthcare.

What we checked

Key checks from this scan, explained in plain language.

How Fraudly checks sites

Helpful findings

Business name presence — References Healthcare.
This website has existed for several years.
The connection to this website is protected.
No matches were found on major scam or phishing lists in this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.

Technical detailsFor people who want to see the underlying checks and technical information.

Trust score

97 / 100

The trust score combines technical checks, reputation signals where available, website history cues, scam intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis.

Signals behind your score

Highly Trusted

Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)

Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=421990

Matches from scam intelligence

Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.

No known phishing, malware, or police-aligned scam warnings were found in this scan.

Detected risk patterns

Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.

No additional prioritized risk rows were raised beyond curated list matches.

Helpful signals & observations

Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.

No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages)Source reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 5846 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): healthcare.gov. Registrar: get.gov. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-16T18:12:16.083Z. Name servers: a1-86.akam.net, a10-67.akam.net, a13-64.akam.net, a24-65.akam.net. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: high
No known phishing report found
This website was not found in known phishing threat lists during this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.
Source: OpenPhishSource reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source: URLhausSource reliability: low
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2026-12-21T23:59:59.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate checkSource reliability: high
Redirect chain detected
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysisSource reliability: high
Older domain registration
The domain has been registered for roughly 16 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: medium

Domain & registration

Checked URL/hostname: healthcare.gov
Registered domain: healthcare.gov
Registration date: 2010-06-29T15:10:36.000Z
Domain age: 16 years, 6 days
Registrar: get.gov
Country: unknown
Expiration date: 2027-05-16T18:12:16.083Z
Privacy / redacted ownership hints: yes

Source: RDAP (rdap.org)

Redirect analysis

Original URL: https://healthcare.gov/
Final URL: https://www.healthcare.gov/
Final domain: healthcare.gov
Redirect count: 1
Crossed registrable domain: no

https://www.healthcare.gov/

Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)

HTTPS/TLS reachable: yes
Certificate trusted in probe: yes
Possibly self-signed / untrusted: no / unknown
Issuer: DigiCert Inc
Expiry: 2026-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

Source: TLS certificate check

Technical source details

Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.

Privacy-protected or redacted ownershipdomainmatched
RDAP entity fields suggest privacy or redaction. This is common and not proof of abuse.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · reliability: low
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 5846 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): healthcare.gov. Registrar: get.gov. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-16T18:12:16.083Z. Name servers: a1-86.akam.net, a10-67.akam.net, a13-64.akam.net, a24-65.akam.net. Privacy or redacted registration details were detected in RDAP entities.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · reliability: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
HTTPS is availablesslno match
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: DigiCert Inc. Expiry: 2026-12-21T23:59:59.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: info · reliability: high
Older domain registrationdomainno match
The domain has been registered for roughly 16 years, which can be a modest positive context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: positive · reliability: medium
Redirect chain detecteddomainmatched
The entered website redirects before loading the final page. This appears to remain within the same registrable domain.
Source: Fraudly redirect analysis · severity: info · reliability: high

Reputation enrichment

Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.

No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.

Quick review probes (baseline scan)

Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.

Trustpilot · Unavailable

Not available

Trustpilot

No public reviews found

Checked, no public reviews found

Google Reviews · Couldn’t confirm this match

Limited info

Google Reviews

We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this exact website.

Couldn’t confirm this match

No reliable public review data found

No reliable public review data was found, indicating a lack of independent customer feedback.

Public review data unavailable for this check.

Source availability (neutral)

Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).

Raw review snapshots

Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.

Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.

Fulfillment signals

Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence low · Score nudge: 0

Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
International shipping detected: unlikely
Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
Corpus: 2 segments / 13040 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: Marketplace terminology detected

No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.

Scoring detail (advanced)

Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.

Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)

Trust-positive signals

Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Healthcare.
Long-established domain registration (-16 raw · high confidence) — Domain has been registered for roughly 16 years—a strong legitimacy signal.
Established institutional-style domain (-10 raw · medium confidence) — The domain appears long-lived with stable naming patterns often seen on established service or institutional sites.
AI assessment: low risk (-4 raw · medium confidence) — AI summary suggested low narrative risk — this adjustment is capped so deterministic intel always dominates scoring.
Valid HTTPS baseline (-3 raw · low confidence) — HTTPS and certificate checks looked healthy in this run. This is supportive context, not proof of legitimacy.
MX with SPF and DMARC present (-5 raw · medium confidence) — Public DNS shows mail exchangers plus SPF and DMARC records—a modest operational anchor when other reputation data is thin.

Website & technical observations

No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
Normal domain length (-5 raw · low confidence) — Hostname length looks typical rather than excessively long.

Detected risk patterns

No business address in snippet (+5 raw · low confidence) — No obvious physical address in the captured text; for blogs, SaaS landing pages and portfolios that is often normal.
Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — No clear contact or support channel was found in the captured content.

Incomplete or unavailable data

Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields.

Scam intelligence weighting (model)

Incomplete or unavailable data

Privacy-protected WHOIS/RDAP data (+3 raw · low confidence) — Registrar or RDAP hints suggest privacy/redaction on ownership fields. · RDAP (rdap.org)

Review collector notes (neutral)

Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.

trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).

Key factors explained

Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.

AI risk signal: low
The domain healthcare.gov has been registered for approximately 16 years, which is a strong legitimacy signal.
The website uses HTTPS, ensuring a secure connection.

AI model used in this run: yes

Own this website?

Claim your website and show visitors that your site has completed Fraudly verification checks.

Verify this badge at Fraudly.app/verify

Fraudly verification reflects available public reputation, security, and scam-intelligence checks at the time of scan. It is not a guarantee.

Download Fraudly Verified badge

Was this Trust Profile helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps improve Fraudly. It does not change this scan’s verdict.

Fraudly summarizes public scam intelligence, reputation snapshots, and technical signals for awareness. It is not legal, financial, or flawless security advice—verify important decisions yourself.

Would I trust this website?

What influenced this result?

Fraudly's Summary

Evidence found

Information we could not verify

Recommendation

Fraudly Trust Profile

Is this website safe to visit?

Is this an official government website?

What do other customers say?

How established is this website?

How complete was our check?

Public reputation

Why did Fraudly give these scores?

Is this website safe to visit?

Is this an official government website?

What do other customers say?

How established is this website?

How complete was our check?

Website History

Stay Safe Online

Business Legitimacy

What we checked

Own this website?

Was this Trust Profile helpful?

Related website checks

People also checked

Would I trust this website?

What influenced this result?

Fraudly's Summary

Evidence found

Information we could not verify

Recommendation

Fraudly Trust Profile

Is this website safe to visit?

Is this an official government website?

What do other customers say?

How established is this website?

How complete was our check?

Public reputation

Why did Fraudly give these scores?

Is this website safe to visit?

Is this an official government website?

What do other customers say?

How established is this website?

How complete was our check?

Website History

Stay Safe Online

Business Legitimacy

What we checked

Own this website?

Was this Trust Profile helpful?