Trust score
50 / 100
The trust score combines technical checks, reputation signals where available, website history cues, scam intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis.
Signals behind your score
Limited verification
Availability: reachable · Website responded. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: full · dns=true · tls=false · botProtection=false · parserFailure=false · contentLength=167790
Matches from scam intelligence
Serious matches from known phishing, malware, or public scam-warning sources. Provider names appear below each row.
No known phishing, malware, or police-aligned scam warnings were found in this scan.
Detected risk patterns
Additional patterns worth a closer look before you pay or sign in—not proof on their own.
HTTPS/TLS connection not established
A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully in this probe.
Source: TLS certificate checkSource reliability: high
Helpful signals & observations
Supporting checks in plain language. “Not found” means we did not see a report in that source during this scan.
No police list match found
No direct domain match was found on the public police trader-warning list checked in this scan.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages)Source reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 70 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): growth-wealths-capital.ltd. Registrar: Dynadot Inc. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-22T07:10:41.577Z. Name servers: angela.ns.cloudflare.com, piers.ns.cloudflare.com. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)Source reliability: high
No known phishing report found
This website was not found in known phishing threat lists during this scan. New scam sites can appear quickly, so this is one signal among several.
Source: OpenPhishSource reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
Source: URLhausSource reliability: low
Domain & registration
- Checked URL/hostname: growth-wealths-capital.ltd
- Registered domain: growth-wealths-capital.ltd
- Registration date: 2026-05-22T07:10:41.577Z
- Domain age: 2 months, 10 days
- Registrar: Dynadot Inc
- Country: unknown
- Expiration date: 2027-05-22T07:10:41.577Z
- Privacy / redacted ownership hints: no / unknown
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
- Original URL: https://growth-wealths-capital.ltd/
- Final URL: https://growth-wealths-capital.ltd/
- Final domain: growth-wealths-capital.ltd
- Redirect count: 0
- Crossed registrable domain: no
Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)
- HTTPS/TLS reachable: no
- Certificate trusted in probe: no
- Possibly self-signed / untrusted: no / unknown
- Issuer: unknown
- Expiry: unknown
Source: TLS certificate check
Technical source details
Raw provider names (OpenPhish, URLhaus, Google Web Risk, RDAP, etc.) for this scan. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant.
HTTPS/TLS connection not establishedsslmatched
A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully in this probe.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: danger · reliability: high
Short initial registration windowdomainmatched
The gap between registration and expiration in RDAP looks shorter than many long-lived business domains.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · reliability: medium
No Police page string matchgovernmentno match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Registration data (RDAP)domainno match
Approximate domain age: 70 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): growth-wealths-capital.ltd. Registrar: Dynadot Inc. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-22T07:10:41.577Z. Name servers: angela.ns.cloudflare.com, piers.ns.cloudflare.com. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · reliability: high
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshotphishingno match
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
URLhaus unavailablemalwareno match
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
Reputation enrichment
Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.
No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.
Quick review probes (baseline scan)
Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.
Trustpilot · Unavailable
Not availableTrustpilot
No public reviews found
Checked, no public reviews found
Google Reviews · Couldn’t confirm this match
Limited infoGoogle Reviews
We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this exact website.
We found possible reviews, but we couldn’t be sure they belong to this exact website.
Couldn’t confirm this match
- No reliable public review data found
No reliable public review data found, indicating a lack of independent customer feedback.
- Public review data unavailable for this check.
Source availability (neutral)
- Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment signals
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence low · Score nudge: 0
- Marketplace terms detected: unlikely
- Third-party seller language detected: unlikely
- Cross-border shipping detected: unlikely
- Supplier fulfillment detected: unlikely
- Separate shipment language detected: unlikely
- International shipping detected: unlikely
- Fulfillment confidence: low · Fulfillment score nudge: 0
- Corpus: 4 segments / 17917 chars · version: fulfillment-v2-marketplace · matched: none
- No strong supply-chain signals detected in snippet.
Scoring detail (advanced)
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)
Trust-positive signals
- Contact information available (-3 raw · medium confidence) — A contact or reach-us section appears on the site.
- Support channel present (-3 raw · medium confidence) — Customer support or help contact paths were detected.
- About the business (-2 raw · medium confidence) — About the business
- Business name presence (-3 raw · medium confidence) — References Growth Wealths Capital.
- Physical address signal (-4 raw · medium confidence) — Physical address signal
- Mail exchangers with SPF or DMARC (-3 raw · low confidence) — MX exists and at least SPF or DMARC is published—common for serious domains and slightly reassuring when intel is incomplete.
Website & technical observations
- No matched Google listing (+0 raw · high confidence) — No Google Places listing matched this domain; review impact is neutral (not a penalty).
- Young webshop domain (+4 raw · low confidence) — The domain is under three months old—common for new stores but less track record before checkout.
- No bait keywords in domain (-5 raw · medium confidence) — The domain does not contain common bait-style sales keywords.
Detected risk patterns
- Unusually long domain (+10 raw · medium confidence) — The hostname is unusually long, which is common in phishing or throwaway shops.
- Business legitimacy caution (+5 raw · low confidence) — Commercial shop detected with very few policy or legal pages visible.
- Short RDAP registration window (+10 raw · medium confidence) — Registration horizon between creation and expiry looks shorter than many established domains.
- No reliable HTTPS endpoint (+22 raw · high confidence) — Port 443 probe did not complete a TLS session.
Scam intelligence weighting (model)
Detected risk patterns
- Short RDAP registration window (+10 raw · medium confidence) — Registration horizon between creation and expiry looks shorter than many established domains. · RDAP (rdap.org)
- No reliable HTTPS endpoint (+22 raw · high confidence) — Port 443 probe did not complete a TLS session. · TLS certificate check
Review collector notes (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
- trustpilot_public · source_unavailable: Third-party Trustpilot snapshot: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
- google_indexed_snippets · source_unavailable: Indexed review snippets probe: snapshot unavailable in this crawl (limits confidence only).
Key factors explained
Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.
- AI risk signal: high
- The domain is unusually long, which is common in phishing or throwaway shops.
- A TLS handshake to port 443 did not complete successfully, indicating a lack of secure HTTPS connection.
AI model used in this run: yes
