Trustpilot
No public review profile found in this scan.
Website trust check
Below is an automated, evidence-based snapshot of merccydeal.store showing risk indicators, trust signals, and technical checks. Results are not legal or financial advice and are not a guarantee that a site is safe or unsafe.
Looking for the long-form trust guide (FAQs, scam vs. legit framing)? Open the merccydeal.store trust intelligence page.
Snapshot only. Data comes from public feeds, technical checks, and limited page context. Phishing and scam sites change quickly—use your judgment and official channels when in doubt.
The website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan.
Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan.
This website triggered several risk indicators commonly associated with scams, phishing, or misleading websites.
Online risks can change over time. Always use your own judgment before purchasing or sharing personal information.
High risk detected
Trust score
47 / 100
The trust score combines technical checks, reputation signals where available, website history cues, scam intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis.
Higher scores usually mean fewer red flags appeared in this snapshot—not proof a site is safe or unsafe.
Public review and reputation signals can help provide context, but they are not a guarantee that a website is safe.
Positive review signals can support trust, but reviews can be incomplete or manipulated.
Trustpilot
No public review profile found in this scan.
Google Reviews
No review snapshot available in this scan.
Positive signals
Risk indicators
Website checked
merccydeal.store
Signals behind your score
High risk
Availability: limited_inspection · Website responded, but some page details could not be fully inspected during this scan. (HTTP 200)
Inspection: blocked · dns=true · tls=true · botProtection=true · parserFailure=false · contentLength=781998
Matches from scam intelligence
Structured hits from curated phishing, malware, or police-aligned feeds in this crawl.
No Safe Browsing, OpenPhish, URLhaus, or police-aligned list matches were returned in this crawl.
Detected risk patterns
Extra risk-style signals scored in this snapshot. They are not definitive proof—a quick second opinion still helps.
Very new domain registration
The registration date implies the domain is only about 3 days old, which is a common risk context signal.
Short initial registration window
The gap between registration and expiration in RDAP looks shorter than many long-lived business domains.
Helpful signals & observations
Facts and neutral checks that balance the picture. Missing a row usually means “not seen”, not proof either way.
No Police page string match
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Registration data (RDAP)
Approximate domain age: 3 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): merccydeal.store. Registrar: NameCheap, Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-08T08:59:53.641Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Google Safe Browsing not configured
No API key is set, so threat matches cannot be requested.
No OpenPhish match found in this snapshot
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
URLhaus unavailable
HTTP 401
HTTPS is available
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Google Trust Services. Expiry: 2026-08-06T09:18:52.000Z.
Domain & registration
Source: RDAP (rdap.org)
Redirect analysis
Security checks (HTTPS / certificates)
Source: TLS certificate check
Scam intelligence sources
Normalized provider output. “Matched” means that source reported something relevant in this run.
The registration date implies the domain is only about 3 days old, which is a common risk context signal.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · reliability: high
The gap between registration and expiration in RDAP looks shorter than many long-lived business domains.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: warning · reliability: medium
No direct domain string overlap was detected in lightly cached excerpts of the referenced politie.nl pages. Missing a hit is not proof a shop is trustworthy.
Source: Dutch Police (public pages) · severity: info · reliability: low
Approximate domain age: 3 days. RDAP target (registrable/root domain): merccydeal.store. Registrar: NameCheap, Inc.. Country: not provided. Expiration: 2027-05-08T08:59:53.641Z. No obvious privacy-service marker in parsed RDAP cards.
Source: RDAP (rdap.org) · severity: info · reliability: high
No API key is set, so threat matches cannot be requested.
Source: Google Safe Browsing · severity: info · reliability: high
No overlapping entry was found in the fetched OpenPhish feed for this check window. This does not prove the site is safe.
Source: OpenPhish · severity: info · reliability: medium
HTTP 401
Source: URLhaus · severity: info · reliability: low
HTTPS is available. This protects the connection, but does not verify that the site is legitimate. Issuer: Google Trust Services. Expiry: 2026-08-06T09:18:52.000Z.
Source: TLS certificate check · severity: info · reliability: high
Reputation enrichment
Optional broader reputation pass when available—beyond the quick baseline probes.
No enriched reputation profile surfaced. That limits context; it does not prove the site is unsafe.
Quick review probes (baseline scan)
Lightweight directory checks powering part of the model—hiccups here describe our snapshot, not the shop’s honesty.
Public review data unavailable for this check.
No public review profile was found, which raises concerns about the site's trustworthiness.
Raw review snapshots
Trustpilot raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Google reviews raw snapshot: not available in current payload.
Fulfillment signals
Dropshipping: unlikely · China-linked fulfillment: unlikely · Local stock/production: unlikely · Confidence: low · Score nudge: 0
Composite model uses raw impacts × confidence weights on the server. Positive numbers push the risk score up; negative numbers pull it down. Neutral rows are explanatory only — they must not be read as endorsement.
Applied trust-score cap after identity guardrails: 100/100 displayed trust.
Combined scoring signals (reviews, reputation, feeds, fulfillment…)
Trust-positive signals
Website & technical observations
Detected risk patterns
Scam intelligence weighting (model)
Detected risk patterns
Review collector notes (neutral)
Buckets distinguish provider errors, source outages, review-derived signals, and (rare) website crawler transparency—never merged with fraud intel.
Key factors explained
Blended notes from patterns we detected, scam intelligence scoring, and optional AI assistance—not legal or financial advice.
AI model used in this run: yes